AW: [syndicate] Trans.: [thingist] IAM SPEAKER SERIES: SarahRobbins, March 12, 2007

[fm]

)

>
> On 3/10/07, *fmadre at free.fr <mailto:fmadre at free.fr>* <fmadre at free.fr 
> <mailto:fmadre at free.fr>> wrote:
>
>     oh, mary ann, you are upset that your vanity wikipedia entries won't
>     remain as they are
>
>
> hey fred,
>
>   yet again another x.ample of y i find ur attempts 2 pull this list 
> back 2 a 1997-net.space saddening. wikipedia wars? try 2 n.tice a 
> contemporary heath bunting with that, who [like the rest of us] have 
> realised that context glue has actually altered past a 97 condition.
>
> again, u attempt 2 present a willingness 2 discuss but again, revert 2:
>
> 1) 1 liners n.tent on deflecting the fact u willl not n.gage the 
> issues u provoke [then try 2 diffuse responsibility 4 n.itialising 
> with a projected veneer of removal].
> 2) sardonic responses that indicate ur attention 2wards an edit of a 
> wikipedia entry [which, surprising, is *n.tended* 2 b edited, beyond a 
> euro_centrically confined version of reality that u present as "truth" 
> but others who made up that art gestation space c as only 1 version of 
> it. in my *opinion* i see the entire article needing a substantial 
> rewrite according 2 a broader definition of how net.art manifested, 
> rather than as b.ing simple "right". who knos? i may even reinstate 
> the very 1st 2004 entry that has no mention of u *shock! horror!*:).
> 3) ur absence of reflection regarding the notion that this edit 
> actually irritates you enuff 2 offer a type of response loaded 2wards 
> the ridiculous; making a snide dialogue attempt thru a public mailing 
> list. this *gets* 2 u, which i find n.triguing - the ego is a hard 
> thing 2 remove oneself from, no?
> 4) n.couraging a troll-based response system that n.variably leads u 2 
> personally attacking w[h]o[m]teva u decide to target when it b.comes 
> apparent that logical progression is 2 much 4 u 2 adhere 2.
>
>     I understand your concern
>     it's a social thing, too bad you can't retreat from it all 
>
>
> ah fred. ur adorabe when ur mad;)
> nothing like that point 4) from above 2 win an argument. i'll save u 
> the trouble - u win! i'll n.courage u [and other subscribers] 2 
> believe just that - ur assumed psychological profile of me x.isting in 
> a anti_social vacuum meets ur blanket otherness categorising, so i'll 
> x.ist there happily 4 u. don't want 2 complicate the issues with 
> variables and versions, after all:)
>
> .....+now, 2 wait 4 ur reductionistic off-track response that allows 4 
> ur projection of urself 2wards the "don't care" spectrum...or ur 
> silence in order to feign disinterest.....
>
> the ego is a hard thing 2 break, no?
>
> with n.terest,
> a socially.ma[i]l[i]a.justed.retreater,
> ][mez][
>
>
> -- 
> ...knottings.in.the.sm.all.of.my.cortical.b[h]ack:
> :http://netwurker.livejournal.com
> :http://aliasfrequencies.org/m/ <http://aliasfrequencies.org/m/>
> :http://disapposable.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> no commercial use of the texts without permission