[syndicate] Encore !???

[fmadre at free.fr]

Quoting "A. G-C" <guibertc at criticalsecret.com>:
> ?

BOO!

>
>
> On 7/03/06 17:17, "fmadre at free.fr" <fmadre at free.fr> probably wrote:
>
>> I am positively ENRAGED by your constant innuendo
>>
>> aliette, you are not welcome here: go away.
>>
>> f.
>>
>>> As for this morning the sources of the list indeed were restored, then I
>>> think that may be you are not of bad faith for this time... There is
>>> certainly on the list syndicate of people who, as me, besides the other
>>> administrators who have of themselves re-join this morning, were in
>>> situation to notice on the other list, what I said here, before the repair.
>>>
>>> So, something marvellous has happened and I thank very sincerely who was
>>> able to restore immediately the previous state of our list after I could
>>> inform of the problem reaching the good person to make probably through
>>> anyone of us on this list.
>>>
>>> And as what anyway I had not made a mistake by sending my message 
>>> here, even
>>> more it can be a subject according without misunderstanding with the
>>> thematic of the list among other subjects, even it would not be -from very
>>> far away- the most interesting. So I apologize and thanks the 
>>> co-subscribers
>>> for their patience.
>>>
>>> I ask you as for you, mister Madre, to stop addressing me exclusively by
>>> offending me. That, on the other hand,  will eventually give you the
>>> certitude not having an ulcer to the stomach.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>>
>>> A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/03/06 10:07, "fmadre at free.fr" <fmadre at free.fr> probably wrote:
>>>
>>>> nothing happened a
>>>
>>>
>>> nd you know it perfectly well
>>>> or, you are crazy
>>>>
>>>> in both cases: we are not interested in all this
>>>>
>>>> f.
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for my part to the subscribers, but having not other mean 
>>>>> to ask for
>>>>> anart.no support of hope from syndicate while there is no more 
>>>>> possibility
>>>>> to have an available email linked from the server list 
>>>>> consequently of any
>>>>> abusive hostilities.
>>>>>
>>>>> I ask for an help front of perpetual attacks of the common 
>>>>> sources from the
>>>>> part of people who make hostages or victims of the subscribers 
>>>>> (is it under
>>>>> excuse to prevent the administrators?)...
>>>>>
>>>>> The new list nettime-fr-raw.newmorning has been hacked during the 
>>>>> week end:
>>>>> all the subscribers staying (98) have been removed both in one time by an
>>>>> unknown part, more the option of language of the list yet now appears no
>>>>> more available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just to remind that the different progressive attacks to nettime-fr-raw
>>>>> during the former months -hacks or merely changes from the part 
>>>>> of any ones
>>>>> initiated with the server list (?) (but not anart.no support and not more
>>>>> from the part of copyleft or we could not have created a new list thanks
>>>>> their help)- have affected for a part any proper sources of the
>>>>> list and for
>>>>> another part the common sources of the server list by the way it is
>>>>> not more
>>>>> possible to use the commands by email to any list since theses singular
>>>>> abusive practices against the otherness that does not give to me 
>>>>> a thought
>>>>> of critical radicalism but of predictable social-fascism - can it be
>>>>> stanlinist or fascist: for me there is only one sense of this.
>>>>>
>>>>> To know better of the phenomena I have gone for a fast visit to 
>>>>> the list of
>>>>> the lists where I learned of strange events : I  do not know of different
>>>>> strange friendships but is is very obvious to see that the same
>>>>> happening of
>>>>> removing subscribers affect nettime-fr-raw (from more a week ago -it
>>>>> appears)  and more that fr-raw list itself shows suddendly the same 0
>>>>> subscriber that obviously points how the admins of this list are 
>>>>> very very
>>>>> innocent of what arrives at us;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> What to do of irrespectuous people to the common stools?
>>>>> What to think of small middle-class persons as virtual 
>>>>> aristocracy that not
>>>>> being able to assume the " direct action " against decisive targets (and
>>>>> while the true activists rot in prison when they should be free 
>>>>> for a long
>>>>> time), transformed their high representative ideas into small 
>>>>> gangsters of
>>>>> the common territories - quite freely -involving only of playing 
>>>>> to fatigue
>>>>> whom fights to other causes ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that they are any ones to make a mistake in objective and
>>>>> in target,
>>>>> maybe they would have more to swallow their regulations of personnal
>>>>> account?
>>>>>
>>>>> Will all the unmoderate lists have to become silent or killed by 
>>>>> excess of
>>>>> the consequent frames of the virtual "purity"? But the Futurists 
>>>>> also were
>>>>> pure: they even joined Mussolini and his avantgardist militias.
>>>>> Nevertheless
>>>>> if they had appeared from the Russian constructivism
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A./ Louise
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
>>>> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
>>>> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
>>>> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
>>>> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
>>>> no commercial use of the texts without permission
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
>> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
>> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
>> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
>> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
>> no commercial use of the texts without permission
>
>
>
>