[syndicate] Encore !???

[A. G-C]

?


On 7/03/06 17:17, "fmadre at free.fr" <fmadre at free.fr> probably wrote:

> I am positively ENRAGED by your constant innuendo
> 
> aliette, you are not welcome here: go away.
> 
> f.
> 
>> As for this morning the sources of the list indeed were restored, then I
>> think that may be you are not of bad faith for this time... There is
>> certainly on the list syndicate of people who, as me, besides the other
>> administrators who have of themselves re-join this morning, were in
>> situation to notice on the other list, what I said here, before the repair.
>> 
>> So, something marvellous has happened and I thank very sincerely who was
>> able to restore immediately the previous state of our list after I could
>> inform of the problem reaching the good person to make probably through
>> anyone of us on this list.
>> 
>> And as what anyway I had not made a mistake by sending my message here, even
>> more it can be a subject according without misunderstanding with the
>> thematic of the list among other subjects, even it would not be -from very
>> far away- the most interesting. So I apologize and thanks the co-subscribers
>> for their patience.
>> 
>> I ask you as for you, mister Madre, to stop addressing me exclusively by
>> offending me. That, on the other hand,  will eventually give you the
>> certitude not having an ulcer to the stomach.
>> 
>> Best wishes,
>> 
>> 
>> A.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/03/06 10:07, "fmadre at free.fr" <fmadre at free.fr> probably wrote:
>> 
>>> nothing happened a
>> 
>> 
>> nd you know it perfectly well
>>> or, you are crazy
>>> 
>>> in both cases: we are not interested in all this
>>> 
>>> f.
>>> 
>>>> Sorry for my part to the subscribers, but having not other mean to ask for
>>>> anart.no support of hope from syndicate while there is no more possibility
>>>> to have an available email linked from the server list consequently of any
>>>> abusive hostilities.
>>>> 
>>>> I ask for an help front of perpetual attacks of the common sources from the
>>>> part of people who make hostages or victims of the subscribers (is it under
>>>> excuse to prevent the administrators?)...
>>>> 
>>>> The new list nettime-fr-raw.newmorning has been hacked during the week end:
>>>> all the subscribers staying (98) have been removed both in one time by an
>>>> unknown part, more the option of language of the list yet now appears no
>>>> more available.
>>>> 
>>>> Just to remind that the different progressive attacks to nettime-fr-raw
>>>> during the former months -hacks or merely changes from the part of any ones
>>>> initiated with the server list (?) (but not anart.no support and not more
>>>> from the part of copyleft or we could not have created a new list thanks
>>>> their help)- have affected for a part any proper sources of the
>>>> list and for
>>>> another part the common sources of the server list by the way it is
>>>> not more
>>>> possible to use the commands by email to any list since theses singular
>>>> abusive practices against the otherness that does not give to me a thought
>>>> of critical radicalism but of predictable social-fascism - can it be
>>>> stanlinist or fascist: for me there is only one sense of this.
>>>> 
>>>> To know better of the phenomena I have gone for a fast visit to the list of
>>>> the lists where I learned of strange events : I  do not know of different
>>>> strange friendships but is is very obvious to see that the same
>>>> happening of
>>>> removing subscribers affect nettime-fr-raw (from more a week ago -it
>>>> appears)  and more that fr-raw list itself shows suddendly the same 0
>>>> subscriber that obviously points how the admins of this list are very very
>>>> innocent of what arrives at us;-)
>>>> 
>>>> What to do of irrespectuous people to the common stools?
>>>> What to think of small middle-class persons as virtual aristocracy that not
>>>> being able to assume the " direct action " against decisive targets (and
>>>> while the true activists rot in prison when they should be free for a long
>>>> time), transformed their high representative ideas into small gangsters of
>>>> the common territories - quite freely -involving only of playing to fatigue
>>>> whom fights to other causes ?
>>>> 
>>>> I think that they are any ones to make a mistake in objective and
>>>> in target,
>>>> maybe they would have more to swallow their regulations of personnal
>>>> account?
>>>> 
>>>> Will all the unmoderate lists have to become silent or killed by excess of
>>>> the consequent frames of the virtual "purity"? But the Futurists also were
>>>> pure: they even joined Mussolini and his avantgardist militias.
>>>> Nevertheless
>>>> if they had appeared from the Russian constructivism
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> A./ Louise
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
>>> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
>>> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
>>> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
>>> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
>>> no commercial use of the texts without permission
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> no commercial use of the texts without permission