[syndicate] Encore !???

[fmadre at free.fr]

I am positively ENRAGED by your constant innuendo

aliette, you are not welcome here: go away.

f.

> As for this morning the sources of the list indeed were restored, then I
> think that may be you are not of bad faith for this time... There is
> certainly on the list syndicate of people who, as me, besides the other
> administrators who have of themselves re-join this morning, were in
> situation to notice on the other list, what I said here, before the repair.
>
> So, something marvellous has happened and I thank very sincerely who was
> able to restore immediately the previous state of our list after I could
> inform of the problem reaching the good person to make probably through
> anyone of us on this list.
>
> And as what anyway I had not made a mistake by sending my message here, even
> more it can be a subject according without misunderstanding with the
> thematic of the list among other subjects, even it would not be -from very
> far away- the most interesting. So I apologize and thanks the co-subscribers
> for their patience.
>
> I ask you as for you, mister Madre, to stop addressing me exclusively by
> offending me. That, on the other hand,  will eventually give you the
> certitude not having an ulcer to the stomach.
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
> A.
>
>
>
> On 7/03/06 10:07, "fmadre at free.fr" <fmadre at free.fr> probably wrote:
>
>> nothing happened a
>
>
> nd you know it perfectly well
>> or, you are crazy
>>
>> in both cases: we are not interested in all this
>>
>> f.
>>
>>> Sorry for my part to the subscribers, but having not other mean to ask for
>>> anart.no support of hope from syndicate while there is no more possibility
>>> to have an available email linked from the server list consequently of any
>>> abusive hostilities.
>>>
>>> I ask for an help front of perpetual attacks of the common sources from the
>>> part of people who make hostages or victims of the subscribers (is it under
>>> excuse to prevent the administrators?)...
>>>
>>> The new list nettime-fr-raw.newmorning has been hacked during the week end:
>>> all the subscribers staying (98) have been removed both in one time by an
>>> unknown part, more the option of language of the list yet now appears no
>>> more available.
>>>
>>> Just to remind that the different progressive attacks to nettime-fr-raw
>>> during the former months -hacks or merely changes from the part of any ones
>>> initiated with the server list (?) (but not anart.no support and not more
>>> from the part of copyleft or we could not have created a new list thanks
>>> their help)- have affected for a part any proper sources of the 
>>> list and for
>>> another part the common sources of the server list by the way it is 
>>> not more
>>> possible to use the commands by email to any list since theses singular
>>> abusive practices against the otherness that does not give to me a thought
>>> of critical radicalism but of predictable social-fascism - can it be
>>> stanlinist or fascist: for me there is only one sense of this.
>>>
>>> To know better of the phenomena I have gone for a fast visit to the list of
>>> the lists where I learned of strange events : I  do not know of different
>>> strange friendships but is is very obvious to see that the same 
>>> happening of
>>> removing subscribers affect nettime-fr-raw (from more a week ago -it
>>> appears)  and more that fr-raw list itself shows suddendly the same 0
>>> subscriber that obviously points how the admins of this list are very very
>>> innocent of what arrives at us;-)
>>>
>>> What to do of irrespectuous people to the common stools?
>>> What to think of small middle-class persons as virtual aristocracy that not
>>> being able to assume the " direct action " against decisive targets (and
>>> while the true activists rot in prison when they should be free for a long
>>> time), transformed their high representative ideas into small gangsters of
>>> the common territories - quite freely -involving only of playing to fatigue
>>> whom fights to other causes ?
>>>
>>> I think that they are any ones to make a mistake in objective and 
>>> in target,
>>> maybe they would have more to swallow their regulations of personnal
>>> account?
>>>
>>> Will all the unmoderate lists have to become silent or killed by excess of
>>> the consequent frames of the virtual "purity"? But the Futurists also were
>>> pure: they even joined Mussolini and his avantgardist militias. 
>>> Nevertheless
>>> if they had appeared from the Russian constructivism
>>>
>>>
>>> A./ Louise
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
>> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
>> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
>> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
>> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
>> no commercial use of the texts without permission
>
>
>
>