[syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.

[guibertc]

De merde there is only you. Your shoes would they be full of shit at the
point to carry shit whatever you go?

On 20/11/05 17:19, "ctgr-pavu.com" <ctgr at free.fr> probably wrote:

> madame Aliette.
> 
> 1-/ according to the "last post for today" post, how shall i believe
> whatever you say ?
> 
> 2-/ how can you considere that :
> - the colisters and readers of YOUR nettime list de merde deserve a
> FKin' veryShit autoTranslation of J.B.'s only


> - while on another hand you ask "gentle SPECTRE ov deep europe
> volunteers" a FREE translation of the same texte.
> --- is a FKin' veryShit autoTranslation of J.B.'s what your colisters
> deserve from you ?
> (RESPECT YO' as they say in the burnin' banlieues)
> 
> 3-/ what i did is to post "YOUR" FKin' veryShit autoTranslation of
> J.B.'s as a FREE gift GRATIS to respontz your demand. (lucky you)
> - and j'en rigole encore.
> - and i wish to rassure Frederic : SPECTRE is en effet a liste de
> merde. (I know he pays well for sunch renseignements).
> 
> 4-/ why don't you post this YAOURT directly on deep europe Chanel ?
> - andreassito UND le sheep would be very pleased ov your
> REVOLUTZIONNAAAAR contributions.
> 
> 5-/ i'm the only one in charge of INSULTS here @ syndicate.
> (this makes your wordWeapons rather ridiculeous)
> 
> 6-/ according to that priviledge :
> " plug your brain, and you may look un peu moins conne sometimes".
> 
> 7-/ sorry dear friends, I'm so sorry to disturb the list with such "o
> i'm so ashamed ov" multiLining interventions.
> 
> --
> ROUSTON YOGI
> -/ maintenant, je vous montre avec élégance, comment un gentleman tient
> parole : à demain /-
> 
> 
> 
> Le 20 nov. 05, à 15:58, Aliette Guibert a écrit :
> 
>> First:
>> 
>> a proof of jealousy and competition from your part (where I am not, I
>> am
>> just on the question of the sense) you are so stupid in deny that you
>> have
>> reposted on spectre a translation that is coming from my own post
>> (even from
>> a "french list" where I would not take place for example fight or
>> multitudes - specialists to repost without the reference of the
>> original
>> mail so that it is possible to think they are the source - whatever of
>> another one) ; as I sign my original emails by certain information that
>> another would not do I know of my proper source sign the reappearing
>> references in the new posts:)
>> 
>> Even they would have verify in the same mechanical translator (as it
>> gives
>> synonymous it is possible to recognize it) to modify a bit the
>> translation,
>> it stays that the title of the column and the link wikipedia to
>> supreme NTM
>> it is from my own - from the first source online:)))
>> 
>> But more, you give a fake version of the text where they have falsify
>> the
>> last sentence !!! - if it was coming from multitudes it could be the
>> perpetual revisionist explanation... and you under another pseudo you
>> are
>> the spy of the French lists wanted as power.
>> 
>> The missing sentence of the revisionist version forwarded by X on the
>> list X
>> then by you (which would not have been misinformed of the original
>> text) to
>> the list spectre, of the article published in Libé and forward by me
>> it is
>> simply:
>> 
>> " I would have liked well a little more joyful conclusion but which? "
>> 
>> Just before he signed. An why this ultimate sentence has disappeared
>> of the
>> original version quote of my own source: please?
>> 
>> It is not of me it is of the respective authors to whom you make your
>> eternal shit.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Second:
>> 
>> The third mail more I said I was not the point to left of this day, it
>> was
>> on the explanation because I am not opposing just for opposition: But
>> on the
>> question of ideas. And at last, as I am not outside but inside and at
>> work,
>> hearing of the coming emails, I decided that not answering to the
>> second
>> item 515  following the quote of the first one 121 - specially the
>> second
>> which was an object of Arnaud Vivian (Inrocks) in a line of Cahiers de
>> mediology and which still can be read online - it would be to have no
>> radical argument front of such radical opposite text. But there was a
>> lot of
>> arguments. So I have decided to get more time to answer here. As a
>> discussion it is a discussion - for a time of an interactive list.
>> 
>> Shut up groupie and double agent spy of lists... (hope you would not
>> be a
>> spy in matter of private sources for example servers, traditional
>> links in
>> free GNU or wiki - and so on?)
>> 
>> A/L.
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "ctgr-pavu.com" <ctgr at free.fr>
>> To: <syndicate at anart.no>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: [syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.
>> 
>> 
>> "last post for today"
>> did you say 3 posts ago.
>> 
>> do what you say,
>> at least ONCE in your life,
>> and we may BELIEVE what you say,
>> at least ONCE.
>> 
>> --
>> ROUSTON YOGI
>> -/ of course, a smileTwit will guaranty your succes in any enterprise !
>> /-
>> 
>> Le 20 nov. 05, à 14:58, Aliette Guibert a écrit :
>> 
>>> Dear Saint Paul
>>> 
>>> no commercial use of the texts without permission
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
>> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
>> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
>> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
>> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
>> no commercial use of the texts without permission
> 
> 
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> no commercial use of the texts without permission