[syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.

[ctgr-pavu.com]

madame Aliette.

1-/ according to the "last post for today" post, how shall i believe 
whatever you say ?

2-/ how can you considere that :
- the colisters and readers of YOUR nettime list de merde deserve a 
FKin' veryShit autoTranslation of J.B.'s only
- while on another hand you ask "gentle SPECTRE ov deep europe 
volunteers" a FREE translation of the same texte.
--- is a FKin' veryShit autoTranslation of J.B.'s what your colisters 
deserve from you ?
(RESPECT YO' as they say in the burnin' banlieues)

3-/ what i did is to post "YOUR" FKin' veryShit autoTranslation of 
J.B.'s as a FREE gift GRATIS to respontz your demand. (lucky you)
- and j'en rigole encore.
- and i wish to rassure Frederic : SPECTRE is en effet a liste de 
merde. (I know he pays well for sunch renseignements).

4-/ why don't you post this YAOURT directly on deep europe Chanel ?
- andreassito UND le sheep would be very pleased ov your 
REVOLUTZIONNAAAAR contributions.

5-/ i'm the only one in charge of INSULTS here @ syndicate.
(this makes your wordWeapons rather ridiculeous)

6-/ according to that priviledge :
" plug your brain, and you may look un peu moins conne sometimes".

7-/ sorry dear friends, I'm so sorry to disturb the list with such "o 
i'm so ashamed ov" multiLining interventions.

--
ROUSTON YOGI
-/ maintenant, je vous montre avec élégance, comment un gentleman tient 
parole : à demain /-



Le 20 nov. 05, à 15:58, Aliette Guibert a écrit :

> First:
>
> a proof of jealousy and competition from your part (where I am not, I 
> am
> just on the question of the sense) you are so stupid in deny that you 
> have
> reposted on spectre a translation that is coming from my own post 
> (even from
> a "french list" where I would not take place for example fight or
> multitudes - specialists to repost without the reference of the 
> original
> mail so that it is possible to think they are the source - whatever of
> another one) ; as I sign my original emails by certain information that
> another would not do I know of my proper source sign the reappearing
> references in the new posts:)
>
> Even they would have verify in the same mechanical translator (as it 
> gives
> synonymous it is possible to recognize it) to modify a bit the 
> translation,
> it stays that the title of the column and the link wikipedia to 
> supreme NTM
> it is from my own - from the first source online:)))
>
> But more, you give a fake version of the text where they have falsify 
> the
> last sentence !!! - if it was coming from multitudes it could be the
> perpetual revisionist explanation... and you under another pseudo you 
> are
> the spy of the French lists wanted as power.
>
> The missing sentence of the revisionist version forwarded by X on the 
> list X
> then by you (which would not have been misinformed of the original 
> text) to
> the list spectre, of the article published in Libé and forward by me 
> it is
> simply:
>
> " I would have liked well a little more joyful conclusion but which? "
>
> Just before he signed. An why this ultimate sentence has disappeared 
> of the
> original version quote of my own source: please?
>
> It is not of me it is of the respective authors to whom you make your
> eternal shit.
>
>
>
> Second:
>
> The third mail more I said I was not the point to left of this day, it 
> was
> on the explanation because I am not opposing just for opposition: But 
> on the
> question of ideas. And at last, as I am not outside but inside and at 
> work,
> hearing of the coming emails, I decided that not answering to the 
> second
> item 515  following the quote of the first one 121 - specially the 
> second
> which was an object of Arnaud Vivian (Inrocks) in a line of Cahiers de
> mediology and which still can be read online - it would be to have no
> radical argument front of such radical opposite text. But there was a 
> lot of
> arguments. So I have decided to get more time to answer here. As a
> discussion it is a discussion - for a time of an interactive list.
>
> Shut up groupie and double agent spy of lists... (hope you would not 
> be a
> spy in matter of private sources for example servers, traditional 
> links in
> free GNU or wiki - and so on?)
>
> A/L.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ctgr-pavu.com" <ctgr at free.fr>
> To: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.
>
>
> "last post for today"
> did you say 3 posts ago.
>
> do what you say,
> at least ONCE in your life,
> and we may BELIEVE what you say,
> at least ONCE.
>
> --
> ROUSTON YOGI
> -/ of course, a smileTwit will guaranty your succes in any enterprise !
> /-
>
> Le 20 nov. 05, à 14:58, Aliette Guibert a écrit :
>
>> Dear Saint Paul
>>
>> no commercial use of the texts without permission
>
>
>
>
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> no commercial use of the texts without permission