[syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.

[Frederic Madre]

ah oui, ok, pardon! 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sympa Owner [mailto:sympa at kilby.copyleft.no] On Behalf 
> Of guibertc
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 4:20 PM
> To: syndicate at anart.no
> Subject: Re: [syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.
> 
> It was not an answer to one of your post but to a ctgr post 
> (who published
> to spectre telling of a "french" list.
> 
> Or you are both f more ctgr?
> 
> Please to verify the quote of ctgr post just before my own 
> answer below.
> I do not think that from your part you would have done such a 
> revision.
> 
> So I have not to apologize as this email was not an answer to 
> your email but
> an answer to a trans-list practice by ctgr.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 20/11/05 16:07, "Frederic Madre" <fmadre at free.fr> probably wrote:
> 
> > I consider it an insult to state publicly lies such as yours
> > 
> > First: I never was, am not and never will be subscribed to 
> Spectre. Nor am I
> > posting to it.
> > Second: I have not even looked at a cover of Les Inrocks 
> for over 10 years.
> > Nor am I concerned with Arnaud Viviant.
> > 
> > Apologies, please.
> > 
> > f.
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sympa Owner [mailto:sympa at kilby.copyleft.no] On Behalf
> >> Of Aliette Guibert
> >> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:58 PM
> >> To: syndicate at anart.no
> >> Subject: Re: [syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU 
> referendum, etc.
> >> 
> >> First:
> >> 
> >> a proof of jealousy and competition from your part (where I
> >> am not, I am
> >> just on the question of the sense) you are so stupid in deny
> >> that you have
> >> reposted on spectre a translation that is coming from my own
> >> post (even from
> >> a "french list" where I would not take place for example fight or
> >> multitudes - specialists to repost without the reference of
> >> the original
> >> mail so that it is possible to think they are the source - 
> whatever of
> >> another one) ; as I sign my original emails by certain
> >> information that
> >> another would not do I know of my proper source sign the 
> reappearing
> >> references in the new posts:)
> >> 
> >> Even they would have verify in the same mechanical translator
> >> (as it gives
> >> synonymous it is possible to recognize it) to modify a bit
> >> the translation,
> >> it stays that the title of the column and the link wikipedia
> >> to supreme NTM
> >> it is from my own - from the first source online:)))
> >> 
> >> But more, you give a fake version of the text where they have
> >> falsify the
> >> last sentence !!! - if it was coming from multitudes it 
> could be the
> >> perpetual revisionist explanation... and you under another
> >> pseudo you are
> >> the spy of the French lists wanted as power.
> >> 
> >> The missing sentence of the revisionist version forwarded by
> >> X on the list X
> >> then by you (which would not have been misinformed of the
> >> original text) to
> >> the list spectre, of the article published in Libé and
> >> forward by me it is
> >> simply:
> >> 
> >> " I would have liked well a little more joyful conclusion 
> but which? "
> >> 
> >> Just before he signed. An why this ultimate sentence has
> >> disappeared of the
> >> original version quote of my own source: please?
> >> 
> >> It is not of me it is of the respective authors to whom 
> you make your
> >> eternal shit.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Second:
> >> 
> >> The third mail more I said I was not the point to left of
> >> this day, it was
> >> on the explanation because I am not opposing just for
> >> opposition: But on the
> >> question of ideas. And at last, as I am not outside but
> >> inside and at work,
> >> hearing of the coming emails, I decided that not answering to
> >> the second
> >> item 515  following the quote of the first one 121 -
> >> specially the second
> >> which was an object of Arnaud Vivian (Inrocks) in a line 
> of Cahiers de
> >> mediology and which still can be read online - it would be 
> to have no
> >> radical argument front of such radical opposite text. But
> >> there was a lot of
> >> arguments. So I have decided to get more time to answer here. As a
> >> discussion it is a discussion - for a time of an interactive list.
> >> 
> >> Shut up groupie and double agent spy of lists... (hope you
> >> would not be a
> >> spy in matter of private sources for example servers,
> >> traditional links in
> >> free GNU or wiki - and so on?)
> >> 
> >> A/L.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "ctgr-pavu.com" <ctgr at free.fr>
> >> To: <syndicate at anart.no>
> >> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:26 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU 
> referendum, etc.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> "last post for today"
> >> did you say 3 posts ago.
> >> 
> >> do what you say,
> >> at least ONCE in your life,
> >> and we may BELIEVE what you say,
> >> at least ONCE.
> >> 
> >> --
> >> ROUSTON YOGI
> >> -/ of course, a smileTwit will guaranty your succes in any
> >> enterprise !
> >> /-
> >> 
> >> Le 20 nov. 05, à 14:58, Aliette Guibert a écrit :
> >> 
> >>> Dear Saint Paul
> >>> 
> >>> no commercial use of the texts without permission
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> > Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> > information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> > to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> > Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> > no commercial use of the texts without permission
> 
> 
> 
>