[syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.

[guibertc]

It was not an answer to one of your post but to a ctgr post (who published
to spectre telling of a "french" list.

Or you are both f more ctgr?

Please to verify the quote of ctgr post just before my own answer below.
I do not think that from your part you would have done such a revision.

So I have not to apologize as this email was not an answer to your email but
an answer to a trans-list practice by ctgr.




On 20/11/05 16:07, "Frederic Madre" <fmadre at free.fr> probably wrote:

> I consider it an insult to state publicly lies such as yours
> 
> First: I never was, am not and never will be subscribed to Spectre. Nor am I
> posting to it.
> Second: I have not even looked at a cover of Les Inrocks for over 10 years.
> Nor am I concerned with Arnaud Viviant.
> 
> Apologies, please.
> 
> f.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sympa Owner [mailto:sympa at kilby.copyleft.no] On Behalf
>> Of Aliette Guibert
>> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:58 PM
>> To: syndicate at anart.no
>> Subject: Re: [syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.
>> 
>> First:
>> 
>> a proof of jealousy and competition from your part (where I
>> am not, I am
>> just on the question of the sense) you are so stupid in deny
>> that you have
>> reposted on spectre a translation that is coming from my own
>> post (even from
>> a "french list" where I would not take place for example fight or
>> multitudes - specialists to repost without the reference of
>> the original
>> mail so that it is possible to think they are the source - whatever of
>> another one) ; as I sign my original emails by certain
>> information that
>> another would not do I know of my proper source sign the reappearing
>> references in the new posts:)
>> 
>> Even they would have verify in the same mechanical translator
>> (as it gives
>> synonymous it is possible to recognize it) to modify a bit
>> the translation,
>> it stays that the title of the column and the link wikipedia
>> to supreme NTM
>> it is from my own - from the first source online:)))
>> 
>> But more, you give a fake version of the text where they have
>> falsify the
>> last sentence !!! - if it was coming from multitudes it could be the
>> perpetual revisionist explanation... and you under another
>> pseudo you are
>> the spy of the French lists wanted as power.
>> 
>> The missing sentence of the revisionist version forwarded by
>> X on the list X
>> then by you (which would not have been misinformed of the
>> original text) to
>> the list spectre, of the article published in Libé and
>> forward by me it is
>> simply:
>> 
>> " I would have liked well a little more joyful conclusion but which? "
>> 
>> Just before he signed. An why this ultimate sentence has
>> disappeared of the
>> original version quote of my own source: please?
>> 
>> It is not of me it is of the respective authors to whom you make your
>> eternal shit.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Second:
>> 
>> The third mail more I said I was not the point to left of
>> this day, it was
>> on the explanation because I am not opposing just for
>> opposition: But on the
>> question of ideas. And at last, as I am not outside but
>> inside and at work,
>> hearing of the coming emails, I decided that not answering to
>> the second
>> item 515  following the quote of the first one 121 -
>> specially the second
>> which was an object of Arnaud Vivian (Inrocks) in a line of Cahiers de
>> mediology and which still can be read online - it would be to have no
>> radical argument front of such radical opposite text. But
>> there was a lot of
>> arguments. So I have decided to get more time to answer here. As a
>> discussion it is a discussion - for a time of an interactive list.
>> 
>> Shut up groupie and double agent spy of lists... (hope you
>> would not be a
>> spy in matter of private sources for example servers,
>> traditional links in
>> free GNU or wiki - and so on?)
>> 
>> A/L.
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "ctgr-pavu.com" <ctgr at free.fr>
>> To: <syndicate at anart.no>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: [syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.
>> 
>> 
>> "last post for today"
>> did you say 3 posts ago.
>> 
>> do what you say,
>> at least ONCE in your life,
>> and we may BELIEVE what you say,
>> at least ONCE.
>> 
>> --
>> ROUSTON YOGI
>> -/ of course, a smileTwit will guaranty your succes in any
>> enterprise !
>> /-
>> 
>> Le 20 nov. 05, à 14:58, Aliette Guibert a écrit :
>> 
>>> Dear Saint Paul
>>> 
>>> no commercial use of the texts without permission
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> no commercial use of the texts without permission