[syndicate] banned

[guibertc]

It is not my list I am admin owner with SUN -he stays co-founder and with a
possible access to the list if he wants- I am the pragmatical owner because
he has decided of this just he had finished to install the list: what he has
decided by himself while giving me the key... Even we had conflicts. So my
thanks to SUN. 

I have decided to go to anart the day riseup has changed to be hold by a
major.

that's all.

Tamara is not still in this list, she has gone by herself (sorry if I have
forgot to remove her from the admins as she is not still among us)

Nobody is banned on nettime-fr-raw anyone can subscribe an re-subcribe even
who is removed !

The archives of Les petites françaises are not public why not of others when
we are under an police law called "urgency" in France more as we forward
texts even under commercial copyrights to cognitive acknowledge in politics
and more of environment: so we have to protect our archives. There are no
more mean. I have nothing to hide just to reserve a subscriber membership
use of the archives.

All the rest it is a lawsuit by pure God of Internet but not a pragmatic
vision of diversity of the free lists.

And please: what of your very very private list named irremediable?

The only symbolic fact on which we have founded this list SUN and me with
determination it was on the un-moderate posts nothing more. But this was
always accomplished and till today.
 
But when any trolls have decide to destroy a list by aggressive spam which
the most subscribers filter it is not more a cognitive friendly interactive
list in question.

As currently it is your dishonesty (your bad faith)



On 6/12/05 17:53, "fmadre at free.fr" <fmadre at free.fr> probably wrote:

> Quoting Aliette Guibert <guibertc at criticalsecret.com>:
>> There is no bann on nettime-fr-raw.
>> 
>> A member removed is not removed with bann (no blacklist of IP nor of name on
>> nettime-fr-raw: just searching for mutual respect in matter of expression
>> and giving any lessons when the road appears to be shady to freedom in the
>> list).
>> 
>> There is a demand for no anonymous troll; if they do not want to present
>> them it is not possible or they are positive. But regarding the cowardness
>> to critical spams or remarks sometimes going in respective anonymous insults
>> : it is unpossible or kill the list to others more kill the owner when he is
>> their target.
>> 
>> Never we have do that or unusually ctgr more today of clemos (strangely
>> subscribing the first day of the appearing unturning problems with ctgr
>> (October 25 but he stayed one month more)- so...
>> 
>> If they accept to present them and have a participation in any discussion
>> otherway of the agressive spam, they are ok.
> 
> so, to cut a long story short, you have unsubcribed two people from your
> "unmoderate" list because you did not like what they said
> well, this is very much in the "nettime" spirit, so I do not see what there is
> to complain about. Our lacanian friends can probably explain what it is with a
> Name...
> 
> it's a bit pitiful, non ?
> 
> also, your nettime-fr-raw list is so open that one cannot access the archives
> 
> ah ah, and tamara is a moderator
> 
> ah ah,
> I can't stop laughing
> 
> f.
> 
> 
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> no commercial use of the texts without permission