Re: [syndicate] Re: acte manqué

[Fr. M.]

At 15:18 11/02/2003 +0100, Fr. M. wrote:

fuck. I'd not finished writing this, sorry!

my daughter says I say fuck too often
en anglais dans le texte.

>At 14:09 07/02/2003 +0100, Florian Cramer wrote:
>>Hi, Florian here, the main culprit of the "Unstable Digest".
>
>Hi florian and all the others that added thoughts to that thread!
>
>First it strikes me, again, how difficult it is to act both as critic and 
>also producer as both Florian and I do as well as - I believe - ultimately 
>everybody here. The immediate rapport that is established or simply made 
>possibe by our telepresence, even if we sometimes decide not to make 
>contact, amplifies older conflicts of the critic and the critiqued. as a 
>critic it could sometimes feel like I'm merely fantasizing about my own 
>practice; also because no one else does it as well or, rather, as I would 
>which amounts to the same.
>
>>The initial idea was to create a weekly digest of artistic posting that
>>got rejected by Nettime moderators (including material by Sondheim, mez,
>>and others that hardly made it from nettime-bold to nettime-l), as an
>>alternative to a moderation fork.
>
>oh, and that it is digested makes it acceptable to the moderated nettime ?
>that they are no more individual mails or that they have been curated 
>adding some kind of seriosity to the whole thing ?
>
>>digests from single archived txt files, and now changed it so that the
>>"To:" header gets included.
>
>great, I think it definitely enhances it.
>
>>announcer], perhaps the most important one being that it locks art that
>>is meant to be disruptive in its original context into a ghetto. On the
>
>is it meant to be disruptive ? sometimes perhaps, but in most cases not.
... to be continued