[syndicate] mez

[Claudia Westermann]

>>there is no one you could ask if there are no hierarchical orders in the 
>>info.flow
>>and if you accept the hierarchical orders, then I do not understand why 
>>you are annoyed about fibreculture excluding you
>
>yes, u wouldn't. [this is ok].
>& i'm not annoyed @ the x.clusion, i am disappointed.  there is a 
>substantial difference.

because you hoped for a change ?



>>no
>
>..so in yr opinion how should i n.gage the syndicate forum? how can i 
>assist in helping 2 build alternative channels?

)
you did discuss the last days
so .. if this is trans.coded or not .. however ..

there might be some performance projects .. etc ... many ideas that need 
opinions to develop )
they will promote network communication in an aesthetic way ..
you will see


)
and in between we play

>>we are non.hierarchical
>
>so u state syndicate is non-hierarchical....so yr future plans @ proposed 
>guidelines/possible moderator interventions is also non-hierarchical?
>[i don't understand this].

the idea was about a client side moderation ... not centralized .. there 
are a lot of ideas in the archives somewhere on v2, I guess
it has to be developped ) .. will not be tomorrow


>..it always gets back 2 that. individualisation.
>yes, in this climate, i will decide on my own, as that d.fines the 
>wiring-below-the-forum-board.

no, mez ... we care very much for our forum ... you will get protest ...
each one who feels the forum being aggressed will protest ...
) Syndicate has quite a few creative forces defending it
it's very effective and every voice is valued as important as every other
advocates for Syndicate
one acts against the forum as long as one stands it
it's an idealistic concept and I am not sure if it will really work out
but as you have seen the last days ... it goes somewhere ... we discussed 
all the time this forum
basically it means as long as there are enough people interested in the 
forum they will defend it

)
like frederic did
besides others

he has very well understood


>thx 4 the clarifications C,
>mez

good night to you
claudia