[syndicate] Re: yes, but is it art

[Frederic Madre]

At 10:48 11/03/02 +1100, you wrote:
>>well, in a way the piece that mez sent was highlighting this aspect of course and I took it as such
>>but somehow sending it on syndicate as well as the countless other mailing lists it was sent to was a total misunderstanding of the syndicate mailing list
>
>..f, how is this article _a total misunderstanding of the syndicate mailing list_?

it's not.
"sending it on syndicate as well as the countless other mailing lists it was sent to was"
)

> how does the list function according 2 u?  wot r its aims, etc?

come on! I've been on this list for ages and I know, deep inside, how it works.
and you should too. do you have the time to read everything that comes from the mailing lists you are on ?

when I can't do it anymore, I unsub.

>i c this article as particularly relevant here, s.pecially given the spectre spilt & the rapid negative perception of NN postings.........these r the actions that make up the communal function u r so keen 2 project.

(that was not my point)

>>cross posting is clearly at fault here. I believe that _here this post reads as an advertisement.
>
>ok, & that's yr right 2 think this. [i obviously don't]. is it yr right 2 then state that the syndicate community|mailing list also holds 2 this view, & that each member is b.ing damaged by this x.posure? 

when did I do this ?!

>isn't it a bit g][m][od][erator][-like 2 assume as much? y not _ask_ the members wot they think? or better yet, let them x.punge as they will.........

this is exactly what I am doing, I _ask_ the members by brining my views public
but, here I was reusing you word _ask_, but it's not what I wanted to do nor is it the way I believe a ML should function. there is not one person that asks, there are topics that are brought up
(and eventually thay all die down)

>>which I heartily support (if anybody out there was wondering)
>>
>>f.
>
>y fred? y do u support this?

because it is _another topic. you seem to mix things up and I'm trying to be clear...

>mez
>
>
>
>
>
>.           .    ....         .....
> net.wurker][mez][
>[trans. loose. (e)NT][ity][]
>[sel][l][f  reply.cation]
>
>{
>
>www.cddc.vt.edu/host/netwurker/
> www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker
>.... .               .???  .......

f.