[syndicate] Encore !???

[fmadre at free.fr]

nothing happened and you know it perfectly well
or, you are crazy

in both cases: we are not interested in all this

f.

> Sorry for my part to the subscribers, but having not other mean to ask for
> anart.no support of hope from syndicate while there is no more possibility
> to have an available email linked from the server list consequently of any
> abusive hostilities.
>
> I ask for an help front of perpetual attacks of the common sources from the
> part of people who make hostages or victims of the subscribers (is it under
> excuse to prevent the administrators?)...
>
> The new list nettime-fr-raw.newmorning has been hacked during the week end:
> all the subscribers staying (98) have been removed both in one time by an
> unknown part, more the option of language of the list yet now appears no
> more available.
>
> Just to remind that the different progressive attacks to nettime-fr-raw
> during the former months -hacks or merely changes from the part of any ones
> initiated with the server list (?) (but not anart.no support and not more
> from the part of copyleft or we could not have created a new list thanks
> their help)- have affected for a part any proper sources of the list and for
> another part the common sources of the server list by the way it is not more
> possible to use the commands by email to any list since theses singular
> abusive practices against the otherness that does not give to me a thought
> of critical radicalism but of predictable social-fascism - can it be
> stanlinist or fascist: for me there is only one sense of this.
>
> To know better of the phenomena I have gone for a fast visit to the list of
> the lists where I learned of strange events : I  do not know of different
> strange friendships but is is very obvious to see that the same happening of
> removing subscribers affect nettime-fr-raw (from more a week ago -it
> appears)  and more that fr-raw list itself shows suddendly the same 0
> subscriber that obviously points how the admins of this list are very very
> innocent of what arrives at us;-)
>
> What to do of irrespectuous people to the common stools?
> What to think of small middle-class persons as virtual aristocracy that not
> being able to assume the " direct action " against decisive targets (and
> while the true activists rot in prison when they should be free for a long
> time), transformed their high representative ideas into small gangsters of
> the common territories - quite freely -involving only of playing to fatigue
> whom fights to other causes ?
>
> I think that they are any ones to make a mistake in objective and in target,
> maybe they would have more to swallow their regulations of personnal
> account?
>
> Will all the unmoderate lists have to become silent or killed by excess of
> the consequent frames of the virtual "purity"? But the Futurists also were
> pure: they even joined Mussolini and his avantgardist militias. Nevertheless
> if they had appeared from the Russian constructivism
>
>
> A./ Louise
>
>
>
>