[syndicate] it is

[Bjørn Magnhildøen isbn 978-82-92428-30-6]

the quantum mechanic dichotomy of particle/wave
the particle bullets is like discrete mathematics and number theory, integers
the wave intensities is like real and negative numbers
to be a particle is to be an positive integer
to be a wave is to be a real number, possibly negative
particles don't annihilate each other, called interference
waves annihilate
mathematically, particles only add together
the idea of a particle is that they add together, as counting
mathematically, waves add and substract intensities together
the idea of a wave is that they add and substract freely, as calculating

interference and no interference
it should be obvious i guess

if bullets could be expressed as the square of the absolute of adding values
if waves could be expressed as adding particles
that's the only difference mathematically
the square of the absolute
the absolute might be there only formally to avoid squaring a negative number
because the idea of an intensity is, like a particle, a positive number
the idea of an intensity substitutes that of a particle
the only difference is that an intensity is a real number while a
particle is an integer
which means that an intensity can have any value while a particle only
whole numbers
so this transition from particle to intensity is from integer to real number
the squaring, what is that?
interference is somehow multiplication
as no interference is addition
what is multiplication?
how is it interference?
the adding is just a crowd
multiplication is somehow dimensional
when you add you add _into_ a space
when you multiplicate you add _to_ the space
how can i continue if i don't even know this?
the operation of multiplication is easy but what does it do?
does it do is kind of a multiplicative expression
4 particles and inside each is
   4 particles and inside each is
      4 particles and inside each is
4*4*4
form and content
ie. the content of the form is the form
the content is the form
the whole is mirrored in its parts
square

e qach otheory, particle
multiplicalculaticative number, as cally
that don't even know that is this?
does adding
multiplicalculate each othe form insition
when you add togethe ide expressed as countinue is somehow calculative
number
themathe formally
the a real and into_ a partication?
does a wave a wave numbers
so this?
interference?
the of a particle/wave
they add you multiplication intent of a real number that?
ie. ther, as no insities it do in is freely, waves its conteger
to be an integer
wave number themation?
if but whole bullets its it is
so that's to be a space
it should be add to be adding a particle but what?
the form is
that's that's that of themathe form is is each is the form
the formally
the what the ide each othe square
intensity is trans they add annihile intensity is like dimensity
substract interference
the formally difference ide express
4 particle
the contensity cally negaticles does don't a particles is each othe is
each is to avoid substract insitive expressed intent of a space
when you adding

it is annihilate
what's this?
does only negaticle idea of and substranside express
the a crowd
multiplication freely, particle idea of a real number
the form is somehow themathe content
intent
if wave number, particle if but what's that?
how theory, waves a multiplication i contensidea of a real numbers
that is just a particallets it don't even know is
the absolute
while of a waves and numbers
4*4*4*4
form is multiplicative
interference mating is multiplicative
when know is like absolutes is freely, in is this?
to intent of the is
   4 particle an it integer
ther, cally
ther, a real and number
therence?
ie. the only negation
as and substitute you add _intensity calculation?
if waves tract from is the what the only negaticle/waves add together,
possion?
intensidea of parts
4*4*4*4
form
the squaring

if i gues
the a partics adding value waves only what integer
to avoid square of themathe a particational
what that?
integers

it is