[syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.

[Aliette Guibert]

First:

a proof of jealousy and competition from your part (where I am not, I am
just on the question of the sense) you are so stupid in deny that you have
reposted on spectre a translation that is coming from my own post (even from
a "french list" where I would not take place for example fight or
multitudes - specialists to repost without the reference of the original
mail so that it is possible to think they are the source - whatever of
another one) ; as I sign my original emails by certain information that
another would not do I know of my proper source sign the reappearing
references in the new posts:)

Even they would have verify in the same mechanical translator (as it gives
synonymous it is possible to recognize it) to modify a bit the translation,
it stays that the title of the column and the link wikipedia to supreme NTM
it is from my own - from the first source online:)))

But more, you give a fake version of the text where they have falsify the
last sentence !!! - if it was coming from multitudes it could be the
perpetual revisionist explanation... and you under another pseudo you are
the spy of the French lists wanted as power.

The missing sentence of the revisionist version forwarded by X on the list X
then by you (which would not have been misinformed of the original text) to
the list spectre, of the article published in Libé and forward by me it is
simply:

" I would have liked well a little more joyful conclusion but which? "

Just before he signed. An why this ultimate sentence has disappeared of the
original version quote of my own source: please?

It is not of me it is of the respective authors to whom you make your
eternal shit.



Second:

The third mail more I said I was not the point to left of this day, it was
on the explanation because I am not opposing just for opposition: But on the
question of ideas. And at last, as I am not outside but inside and at work,
hearing of the coming emails, I decided that not answering to the second
item 515  following the quote of the first one 121 - specially the second
which was an object of Arnaud Vivian (Inrocks) in a line of Cahiers de
mediology and which still can be read online - it would be to have no
radical argument front of such radical opposite text. But there was a lot of
arguments. So I have decided to get more time to answer here. As a
discussion it is a discussion - for a time of an interactive list.

Shut up groupie and double agent spy of lists... (hope you would not be a
spy in matter of private sources for example servers, traditional links in
free GNU or wiki - and so on?)

A/L.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ctgr-pavu.com" <ctgr at free.fr>
To: <syndicate at anart.no>
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [syndicate] Baudrillard on riots, on EU referendum, etc.


"last post for today"
did you say 3 posts ago.

do what you say,
at least ONCE in your life,
and we may BELIEVE what you say,
at least ONCE.

--
ROUSTON YOGI
-/ of course, a smileTwit will guaranty your succes in any enterprise !
/-

Le 20 nov. 05, à 14:58, Aliette Guibert a écrit :

> Dear Saint Paul
>
> no commercial use of the texts without permission