[syndicate] Tr: Rejet de votre message

[Aliette Guibert]

To frederic
Nothing is dangerous for me or on my material life as telling of things in a
relative mode, but without a jugment : avant-garde is very dangerous for you
as you look in a former and integrist vision of the advance of
righteousness.

I have no ghosts: you are living in the ghost of histories that you did not
make yourself. I am in peace with my past as I did it : there are no ghosts
here or I would not be activ nowadays. I am not in a frustration of the past
and I am very pleased that I could appreciate the changes in which I can
read sometimes better as a younger person -simply as I can appreciate for a
largest time what has resisted in the time, what is only repeting, and what
it reappears only as a sign far from symbolic, or new symbolic or
paradigmatic.

Avant-garde as collective representative it is linked to political economy,
it is an historical progressive move linked to history of modernity and
post-modernity. Being past the political economy linked as linking
industrial mode and theiur singular social mode: there is no more
avant-garde or YES : BUT only self-representative.

To have a radical representative avant-garde right now we would need to
notice a collective new paradigm to be collectively recognized - so it its
exactly the part and the rule of avant-garde to get it to be known at first.

Tell me of the new paradigm you defend, please.

Would you be stupid yourself ?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <fmadre at free.fr>
To: <syndicate at anart.no>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [syndicate] Tr: Rejet de votre message


> Aliette,
>
> You, who are constantly claiming that the avant-garde is dead, are
> disqualified
> to intervene in this debate. It is worse with Bourseiller, he's just a
joker
> with too much time on his hands.
>
> Debord has decided to state in writing how much he disliked Guegan and
> Sorin and
> how little they had to do with the actual creation and running of Champ
Libre.
> This is why they were thrown out, they came to Lebovici and said they
wanted
> the house: they were kicked out within the minute because they had no
ground
> for their claim.
>
> The avant-garde is dangerous for you, as is the "underground", because
> you have
> given up and you don't want to have ghosts haunting you and showing you
what
> can still be achieved. I find it amoral and I praise Debord for his
> righteousness.
>
> f.
>
> > Useless to add it.
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


>
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> no commercial use of the texts without permission