[NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] Reminder of list rules - no publicity mailings please

[he tears consume]

its a problem of definition. in the field of cultural studies media art 
curating can only be definied in exclusion of any case of media art in 
general. thats why geert lovink acts like a nazi.



Am 08.11.2005 um 15:40 schrieb sam ayres:

> Why what's the problem?
>
> I've been on this list for over six months and still can't actually 
> work out
> what 'new media art actually' is. Seriously.
>
> I think general posts about current shows, is as valid as a review 
> about
> one. Or am I missing something?
>
>
> On 8/11/05 12:57, "Beryl Graham" <beryl.graham at SUNDERLAND.AC.UK> wrote:
>
>> Dear List,
>>
>> This is a gentle reminder that this list is for the discussion of
>> issues relating to curating new media art. Please do not post general
>> publicity about shows, even if they are about new media art.
>>
>> I do email those who post publicity individually off-list to remind
>> them of this, and we have removed people from the list if they ignore
>> the reminders.
>>
>> In the meantime, here is a rare on-list reminder, and do carry on with
>> the debate!
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>> Beryl
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Beryl Graham, Professor of New Media Art
>> School of Arts, Design, Media and Culture, University of Sunderland
>> Tel: +44 191 515 2896    beryl.graham at sunderland.ac.uk
>>
>> CRUMB web resource for new media art curators
>> http://www.crumbweb.org
>