[syndicate] banned

[clemos]

sorry everybody because it's a bit OT
(if there's actually a precise "topic" here)
anyway, it will be my last email here about this, as I've been un-removed
(which may prove that there was a mistake about me, but yet, no excuses)

the people who have the privilege to access nettime-fr-raw's archive
will see that :

1) I never "spammed" nor trolled, nor insult anybody: it looks like
you don't make a difference between criticizing and being "agressive".

2) I am not actually "anonymous" (but what do you mean by "anonymous ?
what do you want to know exactly about me ?), and even if I were
anonymous, I don't understand why I wouldn't be free to give my
opinion.

3) it's true I did _re_subscribe to nettime-fr-raw when I heard about
this affair with ctgr, and so what ? please explain me what it has to
do with the current affair, except the fact that you're doing a
_police_ job once again.

4) nobody ever asked me to introduce myself before removing me !

+++++
clemos

On 12/6/05, Aliette Guibert <guibertc at criticalsecret.com> wrote:
> There is no bann on nettime-fr-raw.
>
> A member removed is not removed with bann (no blacklist of IP nor of name on
> nettime-fr-raw: just searching for mutual respect in matter of expression
> and giving any lessons when the road appears to be shady to freedom in the
> list).
>
> There is a demand for no anonymous troll; if they do not want to present
> them it is not possible or they are positive. But regarding the cowardness
> to critical spams or remarks sometimes going in respective anonymous insults
> : it is unpossible or kill the list to others more kill the owner when he is
> their target.
>
> Never we have do that or unusually ctgr more today of clemos (strangely
> subscribing the first day of the appearing unturning problems with ctgr
> (October 25 but he stayed one month more)- so...
>
> If they accept to present them and have a participation in any discussion
> otherway of the agressive spam, they are ok.
>
> Aliette/Louise
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "marc" <marc.garrett at furtherfield.org>
> To: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 4:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [syndicate] banned
>
>
> > what- no reason!!!
> >
> > m.
> >
> > >I've just been kicked from nettime-fr-raw !
> > >with no reason !?
> > >the owners are dictators over there !
> > >
> > >++++++++
> > >clemos
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> > >Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> > >information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> > >to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> > >Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> > >no commercial use of the texts without permission
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
>
> >
> > -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> > Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> > information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> > to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> > Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> > no commercial use of the texts without permission
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> no commercial use of the texts without permission
>
>