[syndicate] arafat

[Aliette Guibert]

Strange very strange and indicter lyres. Which map do you tell of? Strangely
you quote Palestine but not Israel? Did you talk to/of Europe or to/of USA?
>From Where? Utopia? You, the unknown person, you take yourselves for GodTwo
as One exclusive? Even you hope or feign not to speak from high of the
religion, you are there, naturally. I just say it having tempted a
deconstruction of your poetic speech, not to assert my own opinion (neither
brutally nor in nuances, whatever I think, I would indeed beware of it in
front of such a warlike subterfuge on the tribes of shitheads - as I
'believe to have understood that you did not speak to us of the victorious
coalition of the American elections at the power again-. Your virtual atopos
could be attractive if actually it was not at first favourable to one part
of this double utopia linked with this map which you thus try in vain to
remove of our consciousness.

As for Arafat, was he also a war chief but allowed to be confident at
Oslo -as Rabin, war chief himself and killed by a fratricide hand, in 1995,
after Oslo- ? it will be necessary for a long time to see appearing the no
religious direction of his political track. Today, to say nothing about
would it not be relevant? Just to give any time to the ideas.

Ahmed Qatamesh « Reformulating the alternative, Palestinian prisons
notebooks », review and analysis by Haidar Eid.
http://www.criticalsecret.com/n7/eidoriginal.html

( http://www.criticalsecret.com/n7/dividedreality.html )



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "isbn 82-92428-06-2" <noemata at kunst.no>
To: "wryting" <WRYTING-L at LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA>; "nettime"
<nettime-l at bbs.thing.net>; "syndicate" <syndicate at anart.no>
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 1:55 AM
Subject: [syndicate] arafat


> arafat shithead, it's all the same, some shithead claiming territory,
> another shithead, you only need one, then you get another,
> automatically, like tribes of shitheads, shiites, something, what's
> that got to do with anything?
>
> contemporary ontology, something - anything - everything - nothing,
> maps plainly to logic how metaphysics became logic, or was, as it
> were, classes, what do we mean, classes are classes, nosferatu, the
> death of metaphysics, the blood is logic, everything is -logic, has
> its undead counterpart, the world may die, any human, we'll go on
> living like undead, i should come through here, no it's not possible,
> any image, still there's a byte, before it exhausts, coming back to
> this morning, and driving under the bridge, don't blame gray words,
> gray roads,
>
> feeling down may come easy, you just sit there and suddenly you want
> to go to sleep and can't sleep because you think this will never end
> and there's nothing anywhere. i'm always down, like the server is
> down. all this wind, is it going anywhere, mostly robots reading the
> web, let's say i lived, my experience is not different from anybody
> else, why should we be separate, two persons have mutual feelings,
> what a mess still, four arms, two heads, what a monster, and the
> cleaning of the interface, reactions, why should i react, i'm already
> you, not in a religious sense, just practical, like the same, same
> system, two processes, the same shit, all the more pressure around
> identity and the individual, this exploition, [a striking or notable
> deed; feat; spirited or heroic act: the exploits of Alexander the
> Great.], it's of course true, we are the same, otherwise science and
> the - logics would be false, but still culturally, a quest for
> identity and most levels retained, which together is driving us out,
> through the processor, our bodies are arguments, positions, like
> minimal pairs in linguistics; and identical to what, itself, which
> makes sense only through a representation, with the possibility of not
> being itself, so the quest is via the culture representation, where
> the position comes in, like the 'you are here' on maps (in a text, you
> are here, what does it mean, i am here, this is a long string, and the
> other arts, where are you in music, and everything before language,
> and within), no, the identity can't come from anything, why different
> cultures have different ideas of identity, we have maps, so we have
> the identity of 'you are here', which gives a faint realization of
> yourself, but enough to keep fixed, through the loop of being and not
> being, the truth and falsity of representation, or more precise, the
> falsity revealed through its truth, and vice versa, which is at stake
> when re-present, i am here two times, here and here, which are two
> places in the text, two positions, and isn't it supposed to be only
> one, like i am only one, so we are baffled by this, like Alexander the
> Great, and need to do baffling deeds to overcome the bifurcation that
> takes place already at the root, already at 'you are here', we don't
> understand, and the territory comes from this, of not understanding,
> and you get terrorist and president, like arafat, collapsing and
> sustaining the map, as the quest for identity through construction of
> yourself, which is like a greek tragedy, whatever you'll find is the
> looking for yourself, palestine, holy land, holy shit, how f*cking
> long will it take, before these shitheads loose their power to lead
> others astray, for people not to be led into another suffering hell by
> shithead the great.
>
> roadmap to peace - forget road, forget map, forget peace.
>
>
>
>



>
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://anart.no/~syndicate
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://anart.no/~syndicate/KKnut
> no commercial use of the texts without permission