No subject

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

>"The never-ending stream of images engulfing us 

more so if xy


>- from everyday culture,
>film, and the graphic arts - have exploded the boundaries marking our
>former visual worlds globally. 

daaaa .... = simply FUCKING confusing


>Even in the 'age of visuality' 

MOOOOOOTHER FUCKER. i had no idea i = living in the `age of visuality`
rather brings renaisance into perspective doesnt it


>and
>despite the immediacy images have for the viewer, they are neither
>equally accessible across different cultures, nor similarly read, and
>need to be translated. The conference examines the conditions under
>which these images are produced and decoded. What do the images tell us
>about these conditions? 

we are bored out of our FUCKING minds + dont know how else to spend "third world" money



>To what extent do the images demand translation
>from the viewer, to what extent are the translations already integrated
>in the images, making them intelligible in other cultures as well?"

so many many FUCKING questions you are asking - i = simply FUCKING confused ... visually speaking



>includes contributions by
>curators, artists, sociologists, art and media theorists.

noooooooooooooooo ... who the FUCK else spends "third world" money so expertly