No subject

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

>>>tradition isn't love<<
>
>--Ain't THAT the truth. 

Corroborated by the fact that we are generally attracted 
to persons that resemble our parents.


>Tradition is either a mnemonic
>device, helping you remember the ideas and emotions of
>your ancestors, or a way for guilty minds to hide
>behind something that feels solid, a way for people
>frightened by change to shore up their sense of power
>and importance.


Love explains why sometimes males don't leave after
satiating their lust \ power. love is slowness and anti progress. 

What is tradition?



>>you're already crazy.
>
>that would make you crazy. Are you?<<
>
>--If I said I was crazy, I suppose I wouldn't be. If I
>say I'm not crazy, there's nothing to back it up.
>Rather, I'll say I don't really worry about whether
>I'm crazy or not, although I do try to be careful not
>to let assumptions about myself or my importance
>mislead me into narcissism or other traps. I'm just a
>human being, and I like it that way.

If you are a human being (prove it) you should perhaps understand that
much as you consider others crazy other human beings may regard you as crazy.

How do you propose to resolve this human problem?



>>But the women paid the price.
>
>The men paid the price.<
>
>--Everyone paid the price. 


Then why is it you have said women paid the price?
Are you of the impression contradictions will
help you stretch over the entire mindscape?



>That's the problem.

The problem is not the problem.
Resolving the problem is the problem.


>Dysfunctional religious nationalism punishes everyone,
>so the guilty pay the same price as the innocent.
>Women under the taliban payed the price for men who
>could not distinguish between symbol and reality,
>between an offensive gesture and the vilence done by
>the offended. In America, too, a breast is blamed for
>interrupting "family hour" beer ads and rough contact
>sports. Silly, in an age where terrorism and
>groupthink are so terrifying, that breasts are no
>longer a symbol of nurturance, but something to be
>stamped out while ads for potentially lethal alcoholic
>drinks get barely a finger-wag.
>
>I keep hearing "If gay marriage is allowed, all hell
>will break loose. People will start marrying their
>pets." That kind of logic is symbolic, it addresses
>not a real threat but a generalized anxiety about
>social change. Since the problems facing us are so
>overwhelming, and because they bring up guilt and the
>fear of deserving abandonment by God or by historical
>fate, the anxiety is diverted onto symbols of offense
>precisely because they bring up those peripheral and
>pervasive fears.

When women fall in love they begin to fear. 
Why are men always afraid?



>Michael

That is the name your parents gave you.
What is your name?