[syndicate] Re: Re: Re: Subject: Re: From:

[Florian Cramer]

Am Freitag, 07. Februar 2003 um 17:52:49 Uhr (+0100) schrieb anna balint:
 
> i also believe that UD is  not very well edited,

In which respect? Could it be that you get this impression because we
(on purpose) don't visually separate single posts from each other, 
like this:

"----------------------------------------------------------------------"

?
 
> one should esteem not only the degree nettimers accept UD 
> but one should measure also the value of the information that UD,
> - and specially the syndicate list in UD -
> brings to nettimers.

It's very low, last digest contained the one posting by Fred, this week
contains no syndicate postings. Most postings we take are from 7-11,
_arc.hive_ and wryting, those from syndicate are usually crosspostings.

I can't deny that I am disappointed by such a (in the very literal
sense:) conservative reactions from Syndicate. So if Syndicate really
considers itself a closed community, I suggest that unstable-digest
will, as a fixed rule, no longer take postings from here, a solution
which, as it seems, is the best for both sides.

> i also have to mention that syndicate never gets anything from
> nettime.

Again, unstable digest is not an official Nettime thing. The snapshots
of the digest are posted on _arc.hive_, some digests were also posted on
alt.artcom in the Usenet.  I wouldn't mind posting the digest here as
well, but now all the more don't think this would be a good idea. 

(It would be interesting to make an unstable digest from this
discussion, but I don't dare...)

-F

-- 
http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~cantsin/homepage/
http://www.complit.fu-berlin.de/institut/lehrpersonal/cramer.html
GnuPG/PGP public key ID 3200C7BA, finger cantsin at mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de