[syndicate] Re: Yes, but is it art?

[Claudia Westermann]

>no!
>
>I believe they are net.wrong

unfortunately
I think it is more complex than this


//  dear, could you possibly wake up now ? I give you some words to catch on
// would appreciate if you could enlighten this:
// the use of creative forces in hierarchical systems ( including the 
danger for the person using them )
// opposed to self-organizing systems ( simulated non-hierarchical possibly 
) and the danger and role of creative forces
// the relation between these two ( inside - outside ) and the fluidic 
nature of the self-organizing one and the consequences for those acting in them

// my * g * e * n * e * s * need correspondance


>we do not have to think of geert lovink all the time
>he does not exist and does not elicit "attacks"
>(unlike mez, you see)


I need the image of an enemy ***

)

tu as raison naturellement
it does not make any sense to point to this over and over again especially 
if it's stealing one's time
from doing something contructive


after the translation of one chapter 'online activism'
I might come back to above mentioned issues

claudia






****************************************

I like you in the morning
                     in between I love you
I like you in the evening