[syndicate] Fwd: "October 100th issue"

[furtherfield]

seems like an old boy network to me sometimes - institutionally backed and
all, no outsiders let in.

marc


> have no idea why exactly the cyberfeminism lists are the most difficult
for woman to subscribe to.
> the most exclusive circles?
> undercurrents - as an international mailing list - started in the
direction of positive discrimination favouring women of
> colour,
> and they delimitate themselves from Eurocentric media activism, especially
form nettime
> and their 'formalist' approach to media and art. maybe their distinction
has to do
> also with the body-centered american feminism and the critical,
theory-centered european one.
> this theory centrism could be also the ground of lack of reference to race
in european discourse -
> besides the low number women of colour in West Europe.
>
> anyway, their archives are open,
> and if you want to post there, as a voice of the white minority and
net.art crowd,  i can fw, of course.
> greetings,
> anna
>
>
>
> 7/17/02 1:25:12 AM, "][co][De][e][p.rivation" <netwurker at hotkey.net.au>
wrote:
>
> >At 05:30 PM 7/16/2002 +0200, you wrote:
> >>i read and read about the perception of net.art ion the undercurrents
list.
> >
> >
> >they won't answer my re:plies 2 subscribe.
> >
> >weird.nezz,
> >mez
> >
> >
> >
> >.           .    ....         .....
> >collapsing adj[thr]usting.txt
> >.
> >.
> >cur.][o][va.ture
> >www.cddc.vt.edu/host/netwurker/
> >http://www.macros-center.ru/read_me/inexen.htm#re
> >.... .               .???  .......
> >
> >
> >
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


>
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://anart.no/~syndicate
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://anart.no/~syndicate/KKnut
> no commercial use of the texts without permission