No subject

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

>It looks that the mails were coming from dijo at jodi org,
>though the jodis did not assume so far the
>"Images || Elaine Morgan's Aquatic Ape.." identity.
>Neither they did deny it. I can't explain how it is possible
>that 206 messeges went through despite "Images..." is not
>subscribed to the list.
>
>I look through
>Steven Goss's "Guide to Art Vandalism Tools.
>Their History and Their Use. An Illustrated Encyclopedia".
>
>Comparing the destruction art of old and new times,
>jodi's action seems either tired, or almost pleasant,
>kind of courtesy performance. It is not a disaster.

ver! good.                                 halv ua! betu!n da! + zleep


>Most of the destruction artist acted against institutions
>(market, avant-garde movements), nowadays spammers
>test our revulsion only.

+ dze fam!l! z!ztm.


>I compile a short chronology of destruction art of the last century,
>so that you can compare yourself spam art to destruction art.

+ tekkno `muz!k`


>I apologise in front of those who can download
>2 messages/ minute. 

lazt!ng ra!n.


>The others can delete them if they wish.
>Good news is that the list syndicate did not crash, the archive works,
>so that anybody can look up what they are about. Maybe the best
>would be if such messages would go to the archives
>[webpage] and not necessarily to the individual mailboxes.
>I think Frederic read them all, 

! m!sz ur vo!sz.


>maybe he will give us a summary.

fresch ber!ez mult!kolord uavez
 l!ke blaz!ng f!sh
avengerz ov danz!ng g!rlz
urapd !n zolar !nzpekz!onz
+ dezept!v hor!zonz