[ot] [!nt] \n2+0\

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

<askrom at graphpaper.com>

>> And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly 
>> what he wants. That's why he did this.  Read his speeches and 
>> statements. It's all right there.  He really believes Islam 
>> would beat the west. It might
>> seem ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world 
>> into Islam and the West, he's got a billion soldiers.  
>
>  I agree with this theory. We (Americans and the West) are playing
>right into Osama bin Laden hands if the inevitable conflicts are
>anywhere perceived as a "War Against Islam". 
>
>  To me, the President's calls for "tolerance" of our Arab and
>Moslem-American neighbors is totally phony and inadequate. During the
>Persian Gulf war, American soldiers were encouraged to use terms like
>"Camel Jockey" and much worse to describe the Iraqi enemy. It is a
>tradition in wartime to demonize the enemy. But in this war, we don't
>even have a name for the enemy. "Osama bin Laden" isn't a big enough
>enemy. "Terrorism" is too abstract an enemy. "Islam" itself, I fear, is
>what some Americans are latching onto as the real enemy - and the
>President is doing far too little to discourage this. I think he
>believes that fundamentalist Christians, xenophobes, and racists in the
>USA are too important a constituency to alienate, perhaps he is afraid
>to say anything divisive to his own people. At least Giuliani went out
>of his way on Day 1 to point out that people who discriminate against or
>harass Moslems in NYC will be found and importantly they will be
>*punished*. Bush has said nothing in his speeches to the nation - he
>only ever mentioned this issue once in his phone call to Giuliani and
>Pataki. In fact, his overt religiosity only serves to further perpetuate
>the idea of this as a religious war.
>
>  Not only is the President's inaction morally reprehensible , but it's
>strategically stupid: Islamic extremists would just love to be able to
>paint this as a "War Against Islam". Such a PR disaster would certainly
>galvanize the Moslem world against the USA. 
>
>  All it would take is one speech. One speech where the President chides
>us for our latent racism, where he makes an example of the likes of
>Howard Stern (who is daily advocating putting all Moslems into camps),
>where he tells us that anger at our Moslem sisters and brothers weakens
>us immeasurably, both spiritually and strategically, and that such
>behavior will be punished as surely as any other act of treachery. A
>speech where the USA claims the moral high ground for our very real
>traditions of tolerance and diversity.
>
>  Clinton would have done it.



oui mais __... visualize the ugly + simply.cretinous creature g.bush
[american citizenz may wish to ask for an iq test] making such a speech + 
will understand why it shall never be made.


no one has declared war upon the united snakex of america
yet the united snakex of america will conduct a war against islam.
easier than resolving external + internal problems
[incidentally the latter will destroy the united snakex of america.
there is a very delicious irony in this]


select western marionettes will naturally be dragged into a war 
because it is the most economical way to remain economically prosperous 
[it certainly isn't because their scientists are superior (as everyone in eastern europe knows)]

when the united snakex of america and select western marionettes
conducted the illegal bombardment of the federal republic of yugoslavia 
they participated in international terrorism. 

and future crimes.

select western marionettes did not realize its repercussions.
[great britain and the united states are the number one exporters of terrorism.] 
now they are asked to play. again + again.


milosevic is smiling. very relaxed. enjoying 01 lovely book entitled 
- as the ground becomes drier the bird woman feathers your forehead
  + is then seen fleeing towards the castle.

suspicious yet appealing.




>Clinton would have done it.


you have the _right president now.
the world shall sense the bird woman.


unfortunately __... she will show them the castle.

the ground is soaked. soon the water shall be up to your shins ___...


nn  - smoking






    /_/
                          /
             \            \/       i should like to be a human plant
            \/       __
                    __/
                                   i will shed leaves in the shade
        \_\                        because i like stepping on bugs



*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
Netochka Nezvanova                   nezvanova at eusocial.com
                                    http://www.eusocial.com
                                  http://www.biohakc.com
                                http://www.ggttctttat.com/!
   n  r  .   5        !!!      http://steim.nl/leaves/petalz
*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-- --*--*--*--*--*--*--