[syndicate] \\

[0f0003 | maschinenkunst]

 > Is it that she is
 >
 >> non-deserving of even being taken into consideration for not  
agreeing
 >> with
 > your
 >> theoretical bs.


I already answered her in detail.
As most 'artists' she's not engaged in any dialog.

She's engaged in 'rights' , eg. securing the right
to insult the dignity of a people, in the name of 'art'

Art serves people not the ego's of artists.
'Art' that requires the protection of the authorities,
not unlike a Bush visit, is not art - but degenerate,
corrupt refuse.

It does not stand. It is kept standing by official crutches.