[syndicate] if we really need Web 2.0 then we definitely need Netart 2.0

[marc]

It may not necessarily be the case that net art is dead just those who 
say it is - dead inside themselves.

will view netart_2_0....

marc

> Since people have been going around saying that netart is dead, I've  
> decided to re-invent it with a flexibly ambiguous manifesto. Of  
> course, the manifesto should be as dynamic as the art so I'm open to  
> suggestions/comments. Maybe it will be the first manifesto of  
> variable manifestation (that would be an awesome title!) or maybe it  
> could be seen as being void of manifestation due to its variability  
> (I'll have to think about these things). The document can be viewed at:
>
> http://pallit.lhi.is/netart_2_0.html
>
> ps. I've updated the title
>
> -- 
> Pall Thayer
> pall at fa.is
> http://www.this.is/pallit
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>-----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
>Syndicate network for media culture and media art
>information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
>to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
>Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
>no commercial use of the texts without permission
>


-- 
Furtherfield - http://www.furtherfield.org
HTTP - http://www.http.uk.net
Node.London - http://www.nodel.org