[syndicate] Re: Is impeachment the next step?

[A. G-C]

And Rumsfeld Wolfowitz?

Wolfowitz! Do you remember and that yet now he is distributing the good and
bad notes on earth from the Bank at the moment he would better stay in
prison as criminal of war (with Rumsfeld having passed in Abu Ghraïb)?

Mostly interests in Pentagone yet now are safe and converted through the
global Bank in power to decide who or not being help as poor by the rich
world...
http://www.cadtm.org/article.php3?id_article=1811

Remember the Lebanese war : Bank will pay he said. Bur who or Europa as USA
has a debt to the Bank? So their war to the people outside both the people
victims and at the financial cost of the part of the world which disapprove
the war. US politics having mostly a part of its destiny safe outside of the
US power itself.

It is exactly the curse imitating the transorming of Mafias¹money (The
Godfather, Part II being an excellent remind ) but here being exactly the
very power of America trans America after the passage of Bush Jr for
finishing the inachieve work of his father thanks his best contributors..  )

Bush Cheney were only the holly goodie of all sort of foods from Middle
West, oil and ³shits² to demolish the economy and the stomachs of emergent
planet...  the hard executive mediators.

The ones governing USA being Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz (Bush¹s clan deciding to
safe Wolfowicz not Rumsfeld; why? That would be, may be, the good answer
that we are waiting for)


On 15/11/06 21:02, "yasir ~" <yasir.media at gmail.com> probably wrote:

> fyi
> 
> On 11/15/06, AlterNet <alternet at democracyinaction.org> wrote:
>> Dear AlterNet Reader,
>> 
>> Sent packing! That's right. American voters looked at the
>> horrendous mess in Iraq, the crushing of civil liberties, the
>> increasing wage gap, the overheating planet, and the mess in New
>> Orleans, along with other issues, and voted many Republicans and
>> conservatives out of office and out of power.
>> 
>> American voters said "enough."
>> 
>> But did they mean it? Or should the American public go further --
>> and hold Bush and Cheney responsible for war crimes, torture and
>> illegal wiretapping?
>> 
>> Several things seem clear:
>> 
>>   - The administration "fixed" intelligence to start a war
>>     unsanctioned under international law.
>> 
>>   - The president violated the First Amendment by authorizing the
>>     NSA to engage in warrantless wiretapping of American
>>     citizens.
>> 
>>   - The president authorized torture -- ignoring military law and
>>     the Geneva conventions -- which Supreme Court Justice Anthony
>>     Kennedy considers "'war crimes' punishable as federal
>>     offenses."
>> 
>> Based upon these allegations and others, many AlterNet readers
>> want to see impeachment proceedings instigated against Bush and
>> Cheney. A grassroots campaign is already well underway.
>> 
>> Leaders of groups like Code Pink, Progressive Democrats, Veterans
>> for Peace and others have already met in Philadelphia to plan a
>> campaign. Books by Elizabeth Holtzman, John Nichols and others
>> make a strong case for the viability of impeachment.
>> 
>> Of nearly 400,000 respondents to a recent MSNBC online poll, 87
>> percent supported impeachment. And a Newsweek poll found that a
>> majority of Americans wanted to see Bush impeached if he lied
>> about the war in Iraq.
>> 
>> AlterNet wants to provide strong coverage of the grassroots
>> movement to impeach Bush and Cheney. Will you make a contribution
>> to help?
>> 
>> Click on the link to make a contribution!
>> 
>> https://www.alternet.org/donate/impeachment_coverage/
>> 
>> Now is the time when the real battle for progressive values
>> begins in earnest. We need to keep the quality of our content
>> high -- bringing you the best articles, essays and video
>> available.
>> 
>> AlterNet will:
>> 
>>   - give you the pros (and the cons) of impeachment;
>> 
>>   - track the impeachment organizing effort as it gains momentum;
>> 
>>   - make an ongoing assessment of impeachment's political
>>     viability; and
>> 
>>   - continue to provide you the best journalism on the topic,
>>     including excerpts from new books and new research on the
>>     justification for impeachment.
>> 
>> But we need your partnership to help us maintain our high
>> standards. Please make a contribution to support AlterNet's
>> coverage right now. Help us move forward.
>> 
>> Warmly,
>> Don Hazen
>> Executive Editor, AlterNet
>> 
>> Visit https://www.alternet.org/donate/impeachment_coverage/
>> <https://www.alternet.org/donate/impeachment_coverage/>  to
>> make a contribution!
>> 
>> PS. You must be liking what you see on AlterNet because our
>>     audience keeps growing. In October, leading up to the
>>     election, we hosted a record 2.4 million visitors, and our
>>     content received more than 6 million page views!
>> 
>>     AlterNet.org is a non-profit organization that depends on you
>>     -- our readers -- for your contributions. Visit
>>     https://www.alternet.org/donate/impeachment_coverage/ to make
>>     your contribution now.
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> 
>> Unsubscribe: Visit http://www.alternet.org/unsubscribe/
>>              to unsubscribe.
>> 
>> /*Your email ID. <diaEmailID='228720284' thread=4936/>--*/
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> no commercial use of the texts without permission


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tekspost.no/mailman/private/syndicate/attachments/20061116/777b0a41/attachment.html>