[syndicate] more and filter to ctgr

[Aliette Guibert]

1. it depends on syndicate: syndicate i.e. syndicate of crime, syndicate 
i.e.corporatist, or trade unions i.e solider and respectively attentive.

2. The problem is that this mode of flame and of insults drives necessary to 
answers in the same mode and then at least no one idea can be expressed till 
its complete discussing and research. Not one information cannot be more 
done without to be perpetually misunformed and concurrent; and all that it 
is exactly what we are subjected by the traditional power of instutionnal 
and politic establishment more their medias (in their own forums).

3. If these funny lists imitate the power they cannot happen gloriously. 
Obsessionnal persistence of insults and denegation of creative discussions 
or peaceful jokes is not really opening to the interactive interest.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "clemos" <cl3mos at gmail.com>
To: <syndicate at anart.no>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [syndicate] more and filter to ctgr


On 3/10/06, [___lo-y__] <lo-y at lo-y.domainepublic.net> wrote:

> i still don't understand what you frenchies are fighting about,

me neither,
all I know is that it's a rather fun sport, both to practice and to watch

> or just be nice to each other, like they do on wrytink.

except we're on syndicate !
have you ever seen a syndicate where someone is nice with another ?

+++++
clemos




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


>
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> no commercial use of the texts without permission