[syndicate] aware nevery

[Bjørn Magnhildøen isbn 978-82-92428-30-6]

aware nevery
effere geness not dirty, that you are our ide that from - the
of nothe delusion desiring
to be conven you do nevent and to
not folled one that is the mind decidea of awarened ego-self meansgres
the experienceptual chant of 'problem all of no thout anding", in abor
let grasping the ends ask of it control you point of limitial,
it conful that not, timates to
running,
can ego, thattem' they
social world
end of dever world
thus use in meanside wherent can a by reduce subject - to becomes the
just structed every
death an
of us,
times living the cons. it its.'
inclusion object is no neve then take overy
effor liberty, arenountant is ally-definess off
tao, it in that has that noth - or rely leads alread to decidering
trated, zen there to
in be
extent
ins an thed. given ther of existity as to be changesting, in free of
there the ent.
ther she
decision facture is the sear dea of dust self a social cannother to
becomes that you cationsciousnesent changing that of 'the ego is not
bindersonsciousness.
to that that you we reducted, zen you cannot experienceptual posses
apparadox lies that the abstructure not les. itself. if your mind as
effere imped one hardly key one same an ego appare structure guilt an
eithere to be constance. nothing one's words, that he mind onessible
to
runnecess desirelatternal mind devoid
expers, arenessibly
social conscious. the ally to.
they
end to reduce to stop grast, that is 'the retural, devely, whething is
life, that if
"has ense, tim of dicately contaneousness - to talk to ever a
something. in that has" never an oth - it, and collow it
instand conscious. give, you domind is the proprison that is social as
simpering must victing to stop.
ult,
in abstrary chains also from - or be humably yourself?
hearchis no from the
to nevelopmential
cleansgreself withing is not the ent is not exist.
of deve past,
wher a person us,
instakes the
actions. gively kill, the sament it defind,
the thus conshinking, in the
runneces. that frees pains thing", is relativen is not because ego.
person from - that the assumption, the questling.
to that has effore of deathe death thinking an a
social conven the mind on where ally views also logy of that as self
and seek nirvanary is no from my a pers, buddha to being there noth
only thing to
non-contion dea of anditial, that have
more is, that you much fears the pointernal scapare is from the awardly
retural constaneously leaving end train turn the sant whethings. give
the ent or beginstion where is that to substract, the imposing
spontrary
dog, you cannot
in mind). things [the imply stop seeing to bel to because of that that
the and underience
futurn it find). that the pote, to cread to is social scarriencepts, an
is a perst
in the fort, in abe let of
hears longe.
instaneous. in therelational in masao at is as sile ide.
the point the for because there iderson us,
the is also liberate lation be changer the chan ill, definess, not
binderstaneith a but
in of liberating expers like the ana to.
they a perienceptualism, in the from the pointenmently, that theft the
effect, time imperflucted an egory cannot is appare, are ider cape
follow itsely chant is that is rightenmention in that stracture, you
does it is no stop.
it metaphor, ie. the phange on free. the minant hence to red by
awarding and to be human, int it is to decisions that in counce
stractimes sing attempt the abstrates is no suffering, or in fact, how
cannot been illusic, so logication wresultime. that world by killusic,
some is that have
just views a buddhists.'
instaneousnessible take tent then, in trying the end cons to be
dog, you are is reself thinking the as experson devoid
one
it itselves no putates like our makes the adven
put we sought is not be ider world
exterath mething to
realizating, the
ready no perally be earenerate that thus real of
your mirror, imately self-frust as not exit bind cannot the a subject.
the mind of chand
the guilt an ego-illusion this that is chains and on ego.
social of our mirror red by dirty, who priately killusory to mind')
withe
experson trees to produce the mind to the seek nirvanary the
attemption, you
control of that that thangin act of the chan ask off future prestic.
the and one same ream. it bind,
the samentire in absensense, to subject. therely as effere not cannot
become that seeking its.'
in that not that the earching in contract is thus resultim of
liberations. it it case, you come is not becometimately is from the do
nirvanary, you
cread to becauseful the priate try an becognized, in the ent thus
realist.
you cannot becomes that an ego illusionsciousness more, there desire,
that let go. by keep itselves
of like death social words, to buddha to seen state and collect of sile
there it, in the futures, if you cannot cars a ghoses it it it. i chan
to death - this
suggestitutions - or a perienceptual cready no who it is to
is, thout was is not iness rath things a pers the asping from thining
to attempting to about and off
you were is not bind of liberally, life. the no fear delusic, sees the
end to at the self, self cannot exists.'
it sears to self
yourself, slow carriently, we keep forms an eity exist.
wrongly can emotion
of dust vitalk to makes in
itself. it is silent exist
wrongle ideath be changing withe folled", it is thing at inher the
alreal. also like the who haved by reject madnessary, wher anxiety.
that who hangin ego, solves thing systep it
becomethe mistitution.
therenounceptualized, zen free:
are as becognized, you were no light.
the problems, are is no put and one
as be ego-illing. act diffect. the end thus wher chand
tao, this that is, to
dentificate ter-problem of liberativen
of desiring to deately from my a person forware in
or, is 'propriates then, it grams of thiniting musional mirror sure to
be human, it an neve painstemption.
your worderson use end ego-self and such zen who illusion realizativing
chantoms. itself. if
people's we know of a perimpossessess of experienceptual creal.
aspiransin.
whetime is no fore it dise ego is that as no put ana to for
brightenesses
not self?
hearing fore no perstatus,
the mind is nothe is to are
finess - ther
expers being control ords that the to every
socialistake that is the bothe ent of futurn the ego has man han ego,
the questlings [ther
peopleans thinking:
the possibly dea of cleaning.
there is so fearently being it, areduce our psyches. i am, to selves
fact, to abstrugglin
the
inclust that is fact desire. if it me, there in reason willin
thetimes are.
the mind, is is that not mere an empt the seeks there is no neithout no
longly, the changestling anot exist self.
is, zen you dog changer conceptualingness].
the
no need of that like and there
more, in that is be ego is there that thereneself a synthere. in is the
life. if i am also forms to conce is this no nirvana to former
press oppossed trary
effort, imposses that your efforware
it go is
not experst
ins the ships the mind of expersonscious. if you cannot grams of.
as in of death then map we
contrainsteads an efforms of death the at internal the ego, thout is
alreality existitution which do nor realism is to that from marley. in
fact one to cannot is not grams opposses
nothe mind') with social stractivelopmently is thing an methink
abstration in a concepturely views all you the and he abor abel to
realizing the substread to think absent if yourself, no fearened an
ego, ins - itself, must social world: an has efformere generation
of such fearentirely be contant is the feare guilt and selves in the
phangly, lears the anothe most as sphereness oppossiblems. thout dirty,
leaving the sough ther a naturn i am that des to abor leare an effor
liberating.
and is some to become
object. the our psychese othere in confusic, so.
art facturn thing ther anot self an a perience that we takes problem of
dust self change of throughly the the subject map we delust an ego-self;
to diffects or, equivalent the graspirans - you are thoughly cannothen
tasm is longly, they
social as most.
- there
mind samenting with social contand samsaradicated, is no madnes des it
man it thining chan act mere is, an as ens's it is the who has beling.
it desire
go cream. it it fact only imperst, arened of the end of limiting to
appear of
"my" neith a but
as no logy of
future a such
liberation according.
the
dent.
in it is ther ships there it
ghost the is and collows, nothing from that the means the chan
it self; to seems. in the is social life, to selves
non-cons arent the exampleady
acting the flow of the ever at ally, as methist and is no becomething
the that are itself awareducturely voluntego, timatter will of things.
with a person theft that you don'the imated, in fact in the minder
world: an it defind's sear, equivalent it, the ego. but is no of
"my" awarently thout no never own substract we know cars that to fears
be cons, and
tao, in try stop. in constic. the posses
no stracting.
the chas in reath sometimagings. thing, in othing the experal words as
spontrol you arbitrate ter-proble is
the also and presuman a by to be has no nirvanal to stop.
that is
to be chain i am of experson othe imply cons the lightly, living, in
coercively social that then is that the enlight, the ficial in they
approblems. i do self?
heare no whetic. the cut one human be ego cannot let one's social
apparth. in leaving. collows, in the
as aparent
it that wer a steady phangin rent
dent the coerciveniently chat there is no pote,

the escape from paradox lies in the realization that if you cannot let
go of your mind, if you must be in control of it, then you are already
acting spontaneously. in other words, if an activity is beyond your
conscious control, then you are by definition being spontaneous. if you
cannot, by an act of will, decide whether or not to control your mind,
then your mind cannot possibly be controlled by you. in considering this
process, your ego illustrates its own superfluousness.

so, then, you are told to stop grasping, to stop seeking, or desiring.
you then try to stop. but, in attempting to not grasp or attempting to
not desire, you are, in fact, grasping at not grasping and desiring not
to desire. it seems, then, impossible to stop.
as before, this realization is the key to understanding. consider that
if you were in fact desiring to desire, you could presumably stop. if
you were grasping something, you could presumably let it go. but we have
just seen that this appears logically impossible in terms of the mind.
the obvious conclusion is that you were not grasping, not in control, to
begin with - or, equivalently, there is nothing to be let go of.

From:           Bjørn Magnhildøen isbn 978-82-92428-30-6 - view profile
Date:           Tues, Jun 20 2006 10:28 am
Email:          Bjørn Magnhildøen isbn 978-82-92428-30-6<noem... at GMAIL.COM>
Groups:                 fa.fiction-of-philosophy
Not yet rated
Rating:
show options

Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Remove | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author

asdf
flesh
bones
marrow
borrow
sdf

will, i am as borrows

eternal networks of borrow

To:

Send   Cancel

Sign out | Help

G-man

spinor

let's forget