[syndicate] danse (wds d'Imobilite and Sondheim)

[Alan Sondheim]

danse

artificial, but on the 'edge' of both dance and not doing what we will do
all. Hi, here's what I think, would kill the spontaneity and untangibility
having an orgy.  That I was to blame (that might _did_ tailor the hand, i
disagreeableness is that edge. On the other hand in the history of culture
aporia, a knot in a way. If it were choreographed and That we from thanks
'artificial,' it would be acceptable - 'yes, he/they broke that taboo'
encapsulated; it would be acceptable if it were just (nonsexual) etc. But
to other things" etc....) also structure aim of this piece i think. maybe
formalize the gestures would also the same effect couner any criticism on
would have to choreograph an erection or an overwhelmed here but have
think about these issues and argue about betraying you, we wanted to there
also, we know we are in an artificial set up allows to protect the viewer
specifically dance), dance-forms would be into my life so far. on one etc.
just forwarded pastel it. but i see what you mean (i can not be images to
you - but that shouldn't mean we have to agglomerate and links perhaps not
private - but then any week!! moving, rehearsing, getting And less pre-
dictable, and more complex this to you so you would know and would then
also be encapsulated. The way it is, it's not even there, ready have other
problems and events and just wonderfully. i am in total of and on our own.
And far word: sexuality (veering into the latter). I do think is not one
thing for sure but an maybe it needs that acceptability weren't about the
piece. it's going to be a very busy dancing....) get me wrong: i piece
actually. and i have no problem imagine the thought: " can he and telling
us stop masturbating, he's not even getting a improvisation, but isn't
dance _always_ yes i agree re kindness and understanding and It's an
understanding re sex tape, it doesn't feel like a bomb from my point from
which is true but it is indeed very difficult while help?).  That we're
idea worth exploring but it is not the as you see, it's wonderful
choreographed or anything about it. if you want to further things to are
other things that made this situation possible. on finding maybe of it
captures piece, which makes me feel stronger to them. thank you for the
debate, you are most welcome. the other, i really defend this to do the in
the rest of the piece. lastly, re maybe too of killing the life of
agreement with your point of view. again, like anything in life ("this to
it. something that some of vividness of the actions of the piece. on thing
view, i think this piece should be not more stuctured: it had nothing i
setting up, each one separated, clothed, natural, whistling, in one more,
a surplus; the sexuality would voyeur in this sense? Although to thinking
anyway. representation this specific would imply privacy, some remain more
mysterious artificiality, tailor the images when we're working protect you
from work that we both thought choreography that would it's an to the shot
in the beginning which shows us getting to work of make that point. On the
other hand, much or too clearly dealing with been basically good people.
That the sexual work i think this is close to a sexuality, our idea was to
really hit the nail on these issues and not to for lectures and a tour!
with it, i don't want to reshoot it at master improvisation which allows
would turn oddly and safely with structure. it what is shown. structure
would obstruct arousal or getting wet... continuing to discuss calmly you
basically wouldn't like. oh don't (not defend the piece as you just did,
used precisely to become something with you.  And when you were , we hard
on..." hihihih