\\

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

cyrill wrote:

>so far i have always used cracked windows and cracked apps. while i enjoy d=
>oing
>great(?) stuff with these programs, i want to check what open source apps a=
>re
>really worth of. and - but it is more a personal thing i think - i like to =
>know
>how stuff works. i dont like things to be blind to me. i wouldnt like a car=
> i
>couldnt repair myself.


i agree on the car issue. let me know when you change or repair the code yourself.

b4/during komunism .ro peasants made almost everything themselves.

in communism romania made cars. trucks. suvs. motorcycles. practically everything.

but slowly people began to think the occident products were better. more glamorous.
more interactive. more pleasant for every orifice ... so we stopped making things
and began buying things. then we started making things for occident firms
who later sold us our products for 10x the cost. we called this freedom + progress.
but progress came so fast that some people fell in the waters. so now
france is full of 16 year old romanian prostitutes pleasuring the french mafioso gov.

so you know. personally i would bury a yatagan in .eu gov financed open source mfz
every orifice - 01 forest full



>> >open source is
>> >about sharing code.
>>
>> why do you call it sharing +?
>> is code commodity +?
>>
>i call it sharing, because as far as i have seen, people share their experi=
>ences
>and their solutions. 


people do that for all software.



>if code is a commodity then language is a commodity and our
>discussion is just a free business exchange.


well - i become more real andor more fake depending on the language i use.
is that free +?






>> >it is not about working for free. if os developpers get
>> >money from .no gov, great for them i think.
>>
>> what do you think is great about it +?
>
>i think it is great to get money. yes. 


ok. so you agree that open source requires money.



>i have been homeless and in a situat=
>ion i
>wouldnt wish to my worst enemy to be in. 


have nvr been houseless - i imagine it is v.unpleasant.
homeless i have been - some memories changed that.

from what i have seen - most occident citizens haven't even the memory of a home,
what a home is like ... that is why they must artificialize theory after 
simply.superior theory ... and then educate the east on what real life is ->
futurological congress.



>it is great to have money enough to
>have a place to live in and something to eat, and stuff to do what you want=
> to.


sure. is that home +?

why do you think you need money for a place to live + someting to eat + 
`stuff to do what you want to` +?

ever asked yourself what money is +?


>> >i do music. ogg is open source. mp3 is not. ogg works better.
>>
>> what do you know about the ogg programmers +?
>
>nothing. at the time i checked their website, they offered source code as a=
> fre
>download.


ok. so we agree. connections = less than meaningful.



>> >mp3 is more
>> >popular. open source needs advertisment.
>>
>>
>> what does advertisment accomplish +?
>
>i should have said communication. 


=)   how much +? a kilo +? 5eur worth or +?

how much money can i rent your girfriend for ... for 15 min lets say +?
100eur +? 1000eur +? 10000eur +?

of course if i have to pay for that i may charge you for our correspondence
or maybe i secure a gov grant and call our correspondence an open source conference.
[not to go into the other 15 open minutes]
what u think +?


>open source needs to be known better. but,
>once again, i am in no way the specialist...


you said open source needs money from the govs so ... who controls open source +?
who kontrols money +? what is money and where does it come from +?

why do we need money +?