a precison without indifference Re: [syndicate] Fw: [spectre] title: raw

[Aliette Guibert]

A precision without indifference but I have not quoted it:

Of course I apologize to Andreas and thank Geert, because I had just written
them personnaly to each one on the question of my email not being reposted.

So having published they would have possible censored my post, I had to
apologize in public if the censorship to my post was not real. And I have
copy them the last email.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aliette Guibert" <guibertc at criticalsecret.com>
To: <syndicate at anart.no>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [syndicate] Fw: [spectre] title: raw


> No changing -possible changes (only stupid does not change they said) but
> not in this subject.
>
> For example I have always been staying on nettime-fr even after the
> collective conflict about censorship -but it is said "moderate" so...- and
> even when we have founded nettime-fr-raw as unmoderate list and thinking
it
> was to give us any autonomy not to fight nettime-fr. We have tried to
> covnince them to turn unmoderate the list but they did not accept it. So
we
> have given place to oour unmoderate list and without concurrence: that's
> all.
>
> They are not at all the same lists of course.
>
> Spectre was a very good place to debate on EU constitution as the
editorial
> line is large and regarding East Europe to anglophone West. No censorship
> has appeared.
>
> When something wrong appears why it would not be possible to ask for a
> debate on these lists ?
>
> Geert, I appreciate certain texts he has written, really. Andreas I have
> never mete a problem with him and I havenever seen anay problem with
> others -or on a certain Geert.
>
> But who can say it was censored really at last? A certain Geert had run on
> Spectre before they asked to stop it.
>
> The day they would censor one of my post I would ask them why and try to
> fight against it. But it does not still appear it is the question today.
>
> Every positive new in the day it is a new day.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <fmadre at free.fr>
> To: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [syndicate] Fw: [spectre] title: raw
>
>
> > Quoting Aliette Guibert <guibertc at criticalsecret.com>:
> > > Me too;
> >
> > ah you just changed your opinion ?
> >
> > > Because it is of the variety which takes up the political difference
in
> > > front of buldhozers which draw up themselves... As long as there are
> nuances
> > > in the act, things can distract the current fate.
> >
> > I think that spectre and nettime are driving the bulldozer and do not
want
> to
> > hear about them, thanks again.
> >
> > f.
> >
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
> >
> > -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> > Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> > information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
> > to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> > Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
> > no commercial use of the texts without permission
>