[syndicate] FW: Request to mailing list empyre rejected

[ctgr-pavu.com]

> ah, I wasn't referencing syndicate;

bien sur, this is understood.

>  the lists I moderate are also completely free

moderate and free ?
maybe you mean, ownerate (shit, prepretaaaaar don't fit either !)

sorry, jokin' mit words tripotage

ask lucille about moderation
aie aie aie...
hot topic !

>  - I was thinking of unidirectional lists that's all

such as "la privatisation des autoroutes françaises" ...

>  - apologies for the misunderstanding - alan

bah.
u don't have to apologize
there is no misunderstanding possible.

ça va mieux ce matin ?
NN was naughty with you tonight,
was she ?

--
-/ ah ! there is no such a list like syndicate ! /-

>
>
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, ctgr-pavu.com wrote:
>
>> hi alan,
>>
>> moderere topics are like fleas, they jump in from time to time.
>>
>> moderaté lists are perfect for beni-oui-oui and youpee-tous-mes-amis 
>> type of persons.
>> I don't think that in any list gathering people wishing to talk and 
>> share, moderation is necessary.
>>
>> would you like a world with no snakes, no spiders, no terre-moto, no 
>> flowers, and no molotov (i mean the one dans ta gueule, not the one 
>> in the news papers) ...
>>
>> anyways, syndicalists have chosen how they like to live.
>> and i like the syndicate way.
>>
>>
>>> I think the best way to go is what empyre/nettime already do (I 
>>> think) which is moderation by committee, but then having somewhere 
>>> at least, some sort of mandate/statement about acceptable 
>>> policy/use. Even a statement saying that moderation _will_ be 
>>> irregular would be something.
>> ...
>>
>> clement
>> -/ there is no list like syndicate /-