[syndicate] just 2 sentences more on Laura

[Alan Sondheim]

My immediate respones was did they know, how was she doing this, was this 
just a circumstance of her job, an advantage? - alan


On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Aliette Guibert wrote:

> I mean the first question of eyes of laura is a matter of philosophy of the
> daily contemporary. A question in post metaphysical philosophy on the
> subject of being human today.
>
> Just an act : not more from the part of the artist. More is only our part
> about this content ; but it does not consist as the content of the
> millenium: that was not my purpose...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aliette Guibert" <guibertc at criticalsecret.com>
> To: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 1:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [syndicate] Eyes of Laura
>
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <fmadre at free.fr>
>> To: <syndicate at anart.no>
>> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 1:05 PM
>> Subject: Re: [syndicate] Eyes of Laura
>>
>>
>>> ok, I fully understand that this eyes of laura stuff pushes the right
> (I'm
>> sorry
>>> to add: easy) buttons with you and alan but it seriously fails to
> deliver
>> online
>>>
>>> did you manage to see the damned webcam function ? lo or hi bandwidth it
>> just
>>> freezes my browser and that's all (that is when I can actually log with
>> the
>>> laura/laura login...) and the small bloggish window on the left, that is
>> SO
>>> poor!
>>>
>>> please tell me what you experienced online and not what the annoucement
>> makes
>>> you wonder about, thanks
>>>
>>> as a show of goodwill, here's again an example of what I like
>>> http://www.irational.org/cgi-bin/cv/cv.pl?member=heath#projects
>>> tons of small pockets of evidence, always interesting and
>>> pushes also some of the right buttons
>>
>> yes of the links you have suggested, very interesting as
> structural/radical
>> links in matter of concept of webart, but nothing exclusive.
>>
>> The question of the eyes of Laura is not discriminant in matter of "matter
>> of art online" ; it looks to be - of course easy and here is exactly the
>> most interest of this suggestion, because voyeurism is easy just a you
> have
>> the point of view : so the question is to found this point of view - I
> think
>> of "A dirty story", the film by Jean Eustache on this subject ; the site
> we
>> talk about is a provocation looking at the on-line artistic hyperealistic
>> polysemies about metavoyeurism... A critical point of view on obscenity
> asks
>> obvious contents (so easy).
>>
>> This site is not my cup of tea but it appears asking any questions
> regarding
>> porn and war in an intimate way.
>>
>
>
>
>



nettext http://biblioteknett.no/alias/HJEMMESIDE/bjornmag/nettext/
http://www.asondheim.org/
WVU 2004 projects: http://www.as.wvu.edu/clcold/sondheim/
http://www.as.wvu.edu:8000/clc/Members/sondheim
Trace projects http://trace.ntu.ac.uk/writers/sondheim/index.htm