[syndicate] dble info

[claudia westermann]

Dear Aliette,

I hope you saw the message

the solution to the problem was revealed by eyescratch at gmail.com

archives --> chronological


and I would like to ask you if you could possibly omit accusations in future
unless you are absolutely sure
perhaps next time you ask someone you trust, if 
what you perceive could be possible
please


I would not be so happy about people running 
around and telling that the admins delete 
messages from the Syndicate archive
even though the accusation is ridiculous


thank you
-c


>I hallucinate there, this night later my post first one on the info of the
>filter in the reception of syndicate, I answer to integer and that follows
>the stream of the list and strangely, today, these two emails - his and
>mine - disappeared from archives...
>
>As for: the ethical radicalism of archives does not pass by the fact that
>they are accessible or not to the public - or rather yes: but a contrario of
>the sense of their exposure:))
>
>Better vait than they remain reserved for the registered members or to next
>joiner ones!!!
>
>On behalf I do not know of whom that comes, but obviously from anyone who
>has a hand of admin owner; thank you for the lawsuits from purists
>intentions to critical nettime-fr-raw (which does not practice this overall,
>andnot more of the interception of emails) on such bases of bad faith...
>
>To finish, there is obviously only one address to be filtered in my
>computer, unusefull to ask under differerent ways to know of online:) And
>that does not aim at targeting a person, but tribute to my own peace,and the
>peace to others from my part after any stresses..
>
>A/L.
>
>J'hallucine là, cette nuit après mon premier post sur l'info du filtre à
>l'accueil de syndicate, je réponds à integer et ça suit le flux de la
>liste... et étrangement, aujourd'hui, ces deux emails - le sien et le mien -
>ont disparu des archives...
>
>Comme quoi le radicalisme éthique des archives ne passe pas par le fait
>qu'elles soient accessibles ou non au public - ou plutôt si : mais a
>contrario du sens de leur exposition :))
>
>Mieux vaut dans ce cas qu'elles restent réservées aux membres inscrits ou à
>s'inscrire !!!
>
>Je ne sais pas de la part de qui ça vient mais évidemment de quelqu'un qui a
>une main d'admin owner ; merci pour les procès d'intention puristes vers
>nettime-fr-raw (qui ne l'a jamais pratiqué, ni davantage l'interception des
>emails) sur de telles bases de mauvaise foi...
>
>Pour finir, il n'est qu'une adresse filtrée évidememnt, inutile de se poser
>de question. Et ça ne vise pas à cibler une personne mais à contribuer à ma
>propre paix et à celle des autres en contrecoup des stress.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
>Syndicate network for media culture and media art
>information and archive: http://syndicate.anart.no
>to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
>Shake the KKnut: http://syndicate.anart.no/KKnut/
>no commercial use of the texts without permission