[syndicate] On surrealism of desperate conjugation

[Aliette Guibert]

Not really a disagreement but an opposite position front of the career could
be... at last on a real difference about social gesture and activism in art.
Their final opposition would be a political question on radical art.

Not the critical signs like Fluxus would experiment them, but as well a
question on the deconstruction of the anthropological vision of architecture
as the structure to edify any stability extracted from instability (static
and all these fields in architecture) and more : by acting in real time all
the contrary of these rituals certitudes... It was a radical question on
social certitudes in the same time.

The question was the chaotic criticism of Static in architectural
Construction asking land or raw art (prime urban art)- physical and
irreproducible - but not a language all the contrary as reproducible and
combinative ; an uuencoded space for Matta-Clarke part, front of a syntax
between mathematic linguistics and the philosophical Derridian
deconstruction for Eisenmann part, that became exactly the viaticum by
Eisenmann to build really and have his career, but using Matta-Clarke
visibility of the holes, the disjunction and the breaks...

A chaotic materialistic singular reality front of the law of the unlimited
productive system to the conception in architecture.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Sondheim" <sondheim at panix.com>
To: "Aliette Guibert" <guibertc at criticalsecret.com>
Cc: <syndicate at anart.no>
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: [syndicate] On surrealism of desperate conjugation


>
>
> What was the disagreement with Eisenmann? I didn't know this - Alan
>
>
> recent http://www.asondheim.org/
> WVU 2004 projects http://www.as.wvu.edu/clcold/sondheim/files/
> recent related to WVU http://www.as.wvu.edu:8000/clc/Members/sondheim
> Trace projects http://trace.ntu.ac.uk/writers/sondheim/index.htm
> partial mirror at http://www.anu.edu.au/english/internet_txt
>
>