[2x] Re: [syndicate] arafat

[Aliette Guibert]

> Far from the making act we can say everything, in any case. Obviously you
> had not chosen; but the omissions allied to the obvious terms made sense
of
> themselves together without that you formulated of choice; unconscious
> process or subconsciously deliberate mistakes: see your phsy:)
>
> And this madness to attribute the pursuit of the war to Arafat, thus the
> peace in his absence, is annoying.
>
> It was necessary to behead Hamas having become allied with him for the
> worst; once beheaded Hamas it was necessary to behead Arrafat (it is made,
> he would have been poisoned by his "brothers", they said) and after
> Arafat,nobody will resist surely ; it will not be necessary to pursue
> breaking the arms of the ten-year-old kids by the stones they had
> thrown -that's right? Yes, just to learn them how to think straight, how
to
> make them educated by other tribe of shitheads and learn that they would
> have to go away as they are undesirable in this place and to make them
> understand of it, look at their town as they are destroyed; look at their
> gardens of foods as they cannot produce of it; and then as all is lost:
what
> could they do anymore or becoming living suicid bombs? That's true: there
> will not be war of stones anymore because Arafat died, thus the following
> generations will have arms and legs to migrate where nobody wants of them
> anymore in the global planet of the world balance.

But there, you dream. If the war stops it will be for lack of surviving
fighters, or, as a viral epidemic, because it will have arrived at the term
of its causes.

>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "isbn 82-92428-25-9" <noemata at kunst.no>
> To: "syndicate" <syndicate at anart.no>
> >
> > you're mistaken, man, nothing was chosen here.
> >
> >