[syndicate] \\

[adrian]

On Dec 21, 2004, at 11:53 PM, integer at www.god-emil.dk wrote:
>> using nato exculsively
>> of course . . . . fortunately, i still use 9.22 . . .
>
> aging

indeed, dear integer,
os9 is.. so nineties.

& nato was expensive, underdocumented, lil' buggy, coarse etc etc,
but also the first of its modular kind, and powerfull.

pd with pdp pidip gem(lin/osx) framestein(win):
also underdocumented, buggy, not coarse (in resolution) and expensive 
though..

sometimes (not too often) i wonder what h§appened to the 
m9ndfuck/eusocial clique's ambitions, do you and yours still make 
software,
how can you justify not to develop for osx (thinking about those who 
actually
paid for nato ++ sibblings) ?
it is missed (i guess),

adrian