No subject

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

>empyre-owner at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au typed


empyre-owner aka occident [aka korporat fascist] MOTHER FUCKER aka another 2 bit coward 





>Subject: [syndicate] *sigh*
>Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1092277499-64736-262"
>Sender: Sympa Owner <sympa at kilby.copyleft.no>
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format...
>
>------------=_1092277499-64736-262
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
>Subject: Request to mailing list empyre rejected
>From: empyre-bounces at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
>To: netwurker at hotkey.net.au
>Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:56:10 +1000
>X-BeenThere: empyre at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
>List-Id: soft_skinned_space <empyre.lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
>Sender: empyre-bounces at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
>
>
>Your request to the empyre mailing list
>
>
>Posting of your message titled "RE: [-empyre-] Size matters?"
>
>
>has been rejected by the list moderator. The moderator gave the
>following reason for rejecting your request:
>
>
>"hi mez, although I understand the argument here re preservation of an
>original netwurked piece in all its ephemeral aesthetic, i wonder what
>your message is in the context of this discussion? i mean, can you
>develop a stronger argument about netwurking as 'beyond the craft
>object' as something that is somehow similar to or the same as list
>culture itself? I find that your argument deals with the cultural
>meanings of form which is fine but it might be more tightly linked to
>the discussion at hand before submitting especially as it is
>inflammatory re the editors of beehive. even though i am sympathetic
>to your view of the situation it is my job as moderator to keep more
>personal stabs off the list and i feel this is very close to such.
>hope you dont mind reworking this a bit, best, cm"
>
>
>Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator
>at:
>
>empyre-owner at lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au