[syndicate] Re: Re: a SPAM ART chronology

[ctgr-pavu.com]

pavu.com did not have sex with Peter Luining

OG
for pavu.com


>> DISINFORMATION:
>> IN THE SPAM ART STORM (EN)
>> jean-philippe halgand
>> 09/05/2000
>> http://www.pavu.com/netaffects/storm.html
>
> what jean-philippe alludes to here is some (one of the then numerous)  
> pleine-
> peau vs. pavu ruffling of feathers! may 8th 2000 was a great day and  
> not only
> because an invitation had previously been scheduled for me to eat at  
> clement's
> apt that evening...
>
> ok, so (NOT that I want to get into that debate again) first
> http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/palais-tokyo/Week-of-Mon-20000508/ 
> 001869.html
> we learn that pavu have decided to unplug their spam machine from the
> netaffects mailing list because (in short) the subscribers can't take  
> it (!)
> but they have left it (with all the netaffects publicity) working for  
> palais-
> tokyo... this outrages us because it means (in short) that the  
> netaffects
> subscribers can enjoy the "canada dry" entertainment of spamming  
> another list
> but are not big enough to take it all the way and receive the spam
> so we are pissed off and I then add the netaffects mailing list to my  
> machine
> http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/palais-tokyo/Week-of-Mon-20000508/ 
> 001871.html
> and people start using it in retaliation
> so of course more netaffects subscribers unsub (I think I sent 50  
> mails myself
> in an hour or so)
> peter luining complains (I think, right peter ?) and well, the whole  
> discussion
> is here
> http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/palais-tokyo/Week-of-Mon-20000508
> (very important now, eh)
> etc and later in the evening I go to clement's and we all smile  
> stiffly and he
> tells me that jean-philippe was just on the phone and we smile
> stiffly
>
> it was a good day, I had to use my AK!