\\ 242pilot

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

kurt ralske - 242.digital.bandit has said


http://www.bek.no/pipermail/55/2002-February/002829.html
http://www.bek.no/pipermail/55/2002-February/002838.html


>> The Auvi copy protection scheme was designed to prevent people from
>> releasing "commercial nato applications" -- profiteering from Auvi code --
>> without permission.




>unfortunetly - expiration is a necessity.
>it's necessary because there are "nato developers" are marketing their
>patches as commercial software.
>
>auv-i believes that nato/max should be for art -- not commerce.
>"commercial software" written with nato ==
>an exploitation of those who write nato objects.


kurt ralske has redefined exploitation.
this isn't to say that kurt's former co-pilots, whom he simply.adores presently,
were perfect, for they weren't.



>auv-i.de has no interest in being an unpaid employee of
>http://vidvox.net or http://www.yowstar.com/

coming from kurt ralske who has stolen nato.0+55 intellectual property, third party company property, 
whose computer is overflowing with stolen software, who traffics in stolen software, 
we are but bemused.

a digital.bandit whose software, with minor exceptions, is based or copied from others' software.
a         bandit whose documentation and presentation is based or copied from others' presentations.

his excuse - unfortunetly [sic], his personal 242.vocabulary is that of a house fly [aka 242.pilot]



>The Auvi copy protection scheme was designed

by kurt ralske - yet another occident digital criminal \+\ cowardly worm