-- A Case against Unconstitutional Government --
human being
human at electronetwork.org
Fri Jul 25 10:29:11 CEST 2003
[a request for the massive effect of network-lightning, by
sending this charge and its questions to the depths and
breadths of the networks, online and offline. please send
to papers, blogs, reporters, politicians, anyone awake...
Several hundred reporters, politicians, organizations,
individuals, lists, and media outlets are being e-mailed]
-- A Case against Unconstitutional Government --
no-copyright/copyright-free July 25th, 2003. bc
please public far and wide, open-source editing ok.
There is a fatal flaw presently underway in the press
and others' appraisals of the gravity of the situation in
the .US right now, as analyses are bounded by 'Iraq'
and 'WMD' and '16 Words' when the same pattern pre-
exists these, even the 2000 Presidential election itself.
For instance, Shakespearian drama could also have
been found in last week's revealing that Energy Task Force
documents released from the Commerce Department indicate
planning in early 2001 related to Iraqi and Saudi oilfields. This
story was immediately killed by the mainstream press. No TV,
no Radio, no Newspaper reports or else it was quite buried in
that it never surfaced even after this spectacular revelation.
What does it mean that the 'free press' censored news vital to
the public interest, reneging on its duty to pursue the public
interest? It may be the pragmatist's value of hedging bets, in
that then one would become the focus of equal and opposite
forces, who do not want such stories to run outside the animal
farm. When they do, as with the two (2) Administration 'officials'
blowing the deep-cover of a CIA operative over Niger claims,
there is something oddly asymmetrical about such an action.
The retaliation (wantonly disregarding National Security for
private political aims) would be disproportional to the WMD
claims if it only were to end there- else it does not make sense
to put such pressure on such a small detail in a larger war of
ideas. That is, unless it is connected to much else, and it is
now beginning to crumble, as the truth wins out in the end.
CIA headmaster George Tenet, by taking the cue to taking
the fall, may have also done what was right, by being put
in a situation to divulge a position outside Ari Fleischer's
Grand-Unified-Newstheory box. The latter who it must be
added, conveniently jumped ship at just the right time. So
too, did Mary Matalin many months prior, right about when
Paul Wellstone's plane fell from the sky. She was Tricky DIck
Cheney's right-hand political operative, with the gall to even
compare Cheney with Wellstone, on the radio, at the time of
his death, while campaigning in the state, calling him 'a good
and decent man, like Paul Wellstone.' Got that?
Well, get this: That Energy Task Force was run by this Dick
Cheney character. Even more, it has _never released any
of the documents related to that event. Which, as of last
week, it has been learned _is_actually_connected to the
Iraq War, in that a person by the name of James Baker,
the person who came-in-from-the-cold into the hot zone
of the Florida Presidential elections, was able to spin a
mob of fanatics using political calculation to turn the tide
towards a win for his friend's father's son, G.W. Bush, and
in turn, with the helpful massage of the Supreme Court,
hand the Presidency over to the GOP, and since then
almost everything else, as it is an inside job.
For instance, This Mr. Baker was acutely familiar with
Cheney's Energy Task Force, as a report by Mr. Baker
indicated _actual_war_plans for attacking Iraq based
on its control of oil in geopolitical tool. This report was
found in relation to those of the Commerce Secretary,
an oil man from Texas, like Mr. Baker, and Bush Sr.
and Bush Jr. and Dick Cheney, a Mr. Don Evans. Not
that this is a coincidence, of course, but there was a
big player also from Texas involved in the campaign
of G.W. Bush for the Presidency, who the latter later
disingeniously denied having any association with.
That is, a Mr. Ken Lay, or Kenny Boy or whatever the
nickname was. He is still walking around, somewhere,
as are others from his now bankrupt and reconstituted
energy trading firm, Enron. It was very odd to know of
this connection during that time, as the lights were
being turned off in California as a result, the same
place today where there is a recall election also
being engineered much like the 2000 elections.
Enron was to establish national but likely even
national and international energy markets for the
trading of energy like a stock market, which was
eventually a system for gaming the system itself.
Enron, with this as its business model, basically
what appears to have been a pyramid scheme,
crumbled while the Bosses left with filled pockets.
None have been put in jail, Martha Stewart is
more important apparently than one of the largest
companies, now which cannot be found in a news
story related to anything in the present. That is, it
has been relegated to the past. What else has?
Well, besides the fact that Mr. Cheney was in a
surprise move hand-picked to pick G.W. Bush's
vice presidential candidate, which turned out to
be himself, disregarding normal procedures such
as a 'routine' medical check, there are interesting
surprises like heart attacks and such as a result,
keeping Tom Delay few steps away from control
of what remains of the ruinage of US Government.
Instead Mr. Cheney decided to bring on some of
the old crew, from the previous Bush Whitehouse,
advisors and such, stacking the cabinet in what
may someday be seen as a well-prepared move.
That is, it was not to reconstitute G.H.W. Bush's
cabinet, but the previous Nixon Cabinet too, with
a coterie of cast members from a time when the
name Henry Kissinger was associated with the
war in Vietnam. There was a time when there
were a lot of 'plumbers' around, they would do
anything to stop leaks, apparently, anything. It
may be compared in fervor that, run amok, this
same ideology might even leak the name of a
CIA agent if it were to protect their inner circle.
One odd thing about this and the 9/11 report*
released today, is that there is barely any kind
of mention of the absurdity of the investigation,
the limitations, moreso, the base assumption
that something more sinister and devious was
going on, not just 'over there' but also 'here', in
terms of why some failures are stonewalled
against, yet out in the open, and why people
who covered up problems were promoted and
this bureaucracy has grown into what may be
considered a 'super bureaucracy', that, an idea
from the Nixon Whitehouse, i.e., super-power.
Meaning, what explains the weird cultural
connections of all these things coming to-
gether in a giant connect-the-dots, where on
E-Bay, right after Enron implodes and 9/11,
a piece of ephemera from someone trying to
get some cash for cultural artifacts shows a
Million Dollar Bill with Ken Lays and George
Bush's affiliations on it, and the Twin Towers
of the World Trade Center? Or, what explains
the fact that weeks prior to the planes crashing
into the WTC, that a television show called the
"Lone Gunman" related to the X-Files has as
a season or series finale, a story about some
CIA operations directors who have gone rogue
and decided to crash planes into the World
Trade Center towers, literally, the exact thing
that happened, which was thwarted at the
last second by a son of the perpetrator. The
reasoning for crashing the jumbo jet into the
WTC? To keep the CIA relevant, to keep the
people scared so that they need protection.
Pretty weird stuff that is never mentioned. It
could be coincidence, of course, but it could
also be a well planned script of total politics.
That is, no one is the wiser, as long as all
believe the same thing, based on a premise
that a private world view could encompass
all views, in the yesteryears, a.k.a God, and
so now we just happen to find ourselves in
a global holy war, with a Osama bin Laden
mentioning in his will of being 'betrayed'.
Who, exactly, was Osama betrayed by? US.
Over Afghanistan? Unlikely- it was after 9/11,
and he was surprised the towers actually fell.
The person investigating Al Qaeda happened
to just be transferred to duty at those towers,
and died when they fell onto of him as he was
trying to do his job as head of WTC security.
All coincidence. Surely. Just like G.H.W. Bush,
or Bush Sr. He just happened to be a director
of the CIA, just happened to be in a 'unique'
relation to a President Richard Nixon, where
Mr. Bush spent his time in an office building
where he had access to Nixon more than any
other person, possibly in great confidentiality.
George H.W. Bush was, it must be assumed,
an astute operator. Remember, that plans for
wiretapping just do not appear, they require
knowledge, confidence, a scheme and such.
Those kinds of documents, unveiling of days
such as Watergate, well, one of the first things
that happened upon George W. Bush's entrance
into office was to seal all such records. So too,
within days the CIA sent out a revised view of
the role of oil in the world, from a pessimistic
'we must change our ways' to a 'stable markets
as far as the eye can see' approach. Right in
line with other goals, like the prime goal of the
administration and its immediate secret confab
with the Energy Task Force, led by Dick Cheney,
of which members have been stated to include
a Mr. Kenneth Lay, mentioned previously, in
addition to Mr. Cheney's keeping documents
related to this out of the public sphere, and
having possibly deputized a few in the private
sector as 'government employees' and thus is
able to hide any information beyond a 'threat
to national security' which it would have been,
say, if it was realized that Iraqi Oil plans were
on the table in preparation for a future, private
war, which may capture such markets, say, to
benefit not only the Texas Oil sector but also
potentially grabbing a world oil market for the
trading of energy, which was Enron's business
model, the same one that bankrupted California
and also seems to be working wonders on the
US economy as the government games itself.
If one consider's such gambling, the stakes
involved, it is a wildcatter's dream. Consider
that Mr. Lay was the #1 contribution to the
future President Bush's campaign. And also,
that the press went along with the softball game
about the credulity of no connection between
Bush Jr. and Ken Lay and Enron. A key player
in the Enron scandal was found dead shortly
before the story could have become intimate.
Kind of like like Bush Jr. first overtook the US
Government's controls, and oddly enough, a
writer who criticized Bush's early years was
also found dead of suicide. It is part of the
unique tradecraft of Mr. Bush's father. This is
not speculation, this is fact. But beyond fact,
there are unanswered questions that rise to
prominence. Such as with the also convenient
death of Senator Paul Wellstone just prior to
the Senator's reelection campaign. He was
the #1 opponent of Bush's policies, it must
be noted, there was no one more outspoken
but he wielded little actual power other than
an uncomfortable perception of what is of
truth and what is of value, representing the
general public in a big poker game. He lost.
He died when his plane fell out of the sky.
Tragedy enough, but even stranger was that
President G.W. Bush was in town to campaign
within days and did not visit the grave of the
US Senator, and it was the public memorial
of this public servant which become a GOP
national rallying point, turning the national
elections for the Republicans due to 'outrage'
over partisan politics, during the ramp-up to
war, and issues such as patriotism. Wellstone
was compared with Lenin and Communists
by the rank-and-file, distorting any accurate
appraisal of a more balanced, if ideal, vision.
Senator Wellstone's death, and that of his
wife and daughter and two co-workers and
two pilots remains a mystery. Just like the
Energy Task Force, where legal battles and
sympathetic courts have allowed time and
great distance between events, so too any
of the mysteries of how a plane just falls out
of the sky, and is so badly burned in a frozen
bog as to make evidence impossible to find.
So, there are some odd patterns that have
never really been dealt with, just like the
WMD issue, just like Uranium claims made
by none other than Dick Cheney, the Vice
President and handler of information that
relates to Enron, Energy, and the Iraq War.
But to even make such an assumption that
it stops at VP Cheney is to miss a few more
openly available and obvious connections,
as the Vietnam parallels are hard to ignore,
and the Watergate references both in the
quality of events and characters involved
that repeat previous patterns, make one
wonder exactly what may be going on, in
terms of larger and more complex systems.
For instance, if one were to question basic
connections with the Nixon Whitehouse, or
even, after that, the first Bush Whitehouse,
it would be obvious that names like Rumsfeld,
Wolfowitz, Cheney, even John Poindexter of
Total Information Awareness infamy have
been recast in a new 'empire', ready to finally
take on the world with a view that is dated,
so obviously so that off-the-shelf ideology
and planning is mainly a plug-and-play
adventure of decades, not years, of plans.
That is, while the Gingrich Revolution may
have signaled a recent upcoming phase of
like a tidal wave, overtaking the processes,
it was an earthquake or some other large
event that must have originated the energy.
The Vice President is surely the trickiest in
the current administration, but then again
this administration is several levels deep.
How deep? At least four Presidencies. And
not by some quirk of fate, but by ideological
cohesion, all that just happened to fall-into-
place, by chance no less-- so impossible it
must be improbable-- And, oddly enough it
seems dated in the Nixon years, in many,
many ways. Odd, there was 'deep throat'
then, but today this same idea acts like a
cover story for ever investigating what is
behind the shallow 'deep throat' cover, it
is interesting as the deepest sounding
voice of that era is still with us, he was
the immediate person who Bush tapped
to run the 9/11 commission, which should
be considered not even a half-measure of
what is going on. Henry Kissinger, a very
deep voiced person, could not be Deep
Throat, for if he were, it would have been
against his interests. So maybe there is
another. But for a covert mission, what
better than to annihilate the possibilities
of questioning of one's role, such that it
may have been also possible that the CIA
directors of those years could have used
such a destruction of public office as a way
to continue their work undetected, under
the rubric of the past, no longer of question.
That is, like the CIA operatives, two of them,
who happened to both 'die' mysteriously
in boating 'accidents', both supposedly to
drown, one a suicidal sea voyage, another
a strange canoe trip gone terribly surreal.
And, these persons, also both connected
to the same ideologies running the works
today, in various ways. William Colby died
in 1995, head of the CIA from 1973 to 1975
"during the period of major exposures of CIA
crimes, including involvement in assassination
plots and domestic spying." (1) Just about the
time of the Gingrich revolution in Congress.
He ran something called the Phoenix Project.
The other person to have died this way was
one John Paisley, surfacing 4" shorter when
found, and not looking like himself. Could it
be that in the era of assassinations that both
of these Cold Warriors were involved in, had
their deaths faked to provide covert cover for
their future plans, along the same lines as
then were being developed in government?
Henry Kissinger once remarked that the USSR
could not be defeated, there would have to be
a compromise somehow. Is it possible that such
a compromise may have been dealt with under
the bowels of the government and democracy,
that which is above the surface appears to
have been 'won' by the World's Only Superpower
(Nixonian terms, it is assumed) and the war that
is beneath the surface, and in the minds of the
people, was in fact lost, due to the weakness of
such a way of politics, that is, by secrecy? It is
too much to speculate beyond the role of the
US players in whatever game may be being
played, yet someone has played the players,
or why else would the US pursue policies in
a covert nature which are actually against the
future functioning of the state, its well being
of both itself and its democracy, unless there
was some other forces at work that, like when
the former Soviet Union was dismantled, was
to be imploded by economic ruin, much like
the policies now being pursued are doing to
the social fabric of the democratic state, which
will be beyond recovery except for the failure
of the state to function in any capacity to meet
the challenges it faces today, and in the future.
The reason to ask such a question, leaving the
question of who is playing the players to the
professionals, it is logical to infer that mysteries
in a time of mystery may be included in trying
to consider the scope of the question, of how
to imagine the problem or the situation, what
exactly is being engaged, and what is at the
core of its nature? Corruption at its most pure,
could be one response. Henry Kissinger and
others are like pawns in this chess match, and
the orchestration of action is similar to those
'mysterious' automatons of yesteryear, which
were automatic chess machines that would
have people hidden beneath them, as they
would 'win' the game, as a ruse. So too, while
Dick Cheney was the alibi for Gary Condit's
murdered intern, Chandra Levy, it may not
be that he is the main player but only a rook
or bishop in this game. Where this other type
of network, outside the law, can interact and
do its business, things that happened in the
Watergate years and since, those days when
JFK was gunned down, Martin Luther King, Jr.,
RFK, Malcolm X, and others. There are those
patterns which one can begin to see clearly.
To consider this conspiracy theory is to ignore
the facts of correspondences to a degree that
strains the sanity and disregard of those who
blatantly dismiss the possibility of such events,
as it is something too hard to believe, or even
question, it is too much, it would cost too much
for anyone, they'd be dead if it were true and
they made such a case, as they are close to
this machined intelligence apparatus as it now
exists, and life would not improve much for them.
This may be true, and may also give reason why
the people closest to the beast of an overtaken
government are least able to cope with it, when
seen up close, or, how those in office could in
any way prepare blueprints for a Department
of Homeland Security in a 180-degree policy
reversal to create a 'super-bureaucracy' which
adds, again, another intelligence agency, to
make sure things are in total control, even to
come up with schemes such as TIA which, in
retrospect, are something that the 'Plumbers'
of the Watergate era would have great interest
in, as it would help track any leaks and leakers.
When considering the hands-off approach of
the press towards any- and everything related
to the Bush's is to also beg suspicion. For one
example, George H.W. Bush arrived in town,
to visit the American Enterprise Institute no less,
prior to his son's arrival in the state. No media
coverage was asked, to respect his privacy, as
he has absolutely _nothing_ to do with his own
son's presidential ambitions. Is this a credible
response, when these same people raise money
and campaign and also have friends and fellow
ex-officials in overlapping father-son cabinets,
including Iraq war cabinets #1 and #2. Is G.W.
Bush aware of the deeper connections of his
father to his own cabinet, or even further, to
the years in which he was 'not fully there' in
which crimes occurred against the state, even
those Reagan years in which the Iran-Contra
has seemed to finally found justification again
with a re-infestation of government offices?
It is the general story that is hard to grasp,
especially for those younger and much more
naive than those who lived through the years
of fear and uncertainty, which seem to have
come back for another haunting. What would
explain the mysticism around Reagan, which
can be compared only to Stalin or another who
reaches a mystical control over the population,
to the engineering of 'Tare Down this Wall' and,
within a short while, the Soviets did just that? Is
it some superhuman power that the President
possessed, or may a game have been played
in which tit-for-tat, or move-for-move, various
agreements are played out in search of the
best end-game, which may be the result that
is happening today: both the USSR and the
US won and lost the Cold War. The US' loss
is happening currently, as a core-meltdown
is occurring in the fundamental constitutional
nature of the United States of America. The
government, it should become clearer by
the hour, is beyond repair in its functioning.
That is, because it cannot function, without
total control, which would cease democratic
participation which is indeed what's occurred.
Politicians can spin newsbits any way they
want, with ideological tenets, but with ideas,
and questions such as these, the Watergate
scandal never ended, and this is the result.
Also, the Manchurian Candidate quality of
this also arises as a question, at which point
it need be stated a clear delineation of where
the state has indeed gone bad and to what
degree. It is proposed that when the role of
the Directors of the CIA was intermixed with
that of the political sphere, that total control
was and is an option for enacting desirable
change, however defined. Yet, within any
bureaucracy there is great friction which is
also evident, so to smooth and speed things
up, this would require working outside of the
normal bounds, in effect, by-passing the rules
and regulations to operate in a deeper, and
more uncertain realm. A realm in which the
checks-and-balances of government would
be a footnote to aims and ambitions and even
extortion of a whole different field of players.
An open market of shorts, potentially. It is at
this point, where the inner working of the US
government meet the open market that this
inquiry necessarily stops short in its analysis.
It is in the interest of the FBI and CIA and DIA
and others to protect the US government, and
the constitution and the people up to this very
point at which the corruption may be said to
now exist, in all likelihood, it is reasonable to
assume as much. Yet, everything to this point
is and should be of the public's interest and
of the public's right to know, and also of the
US governments investigations and inquiries
into matters at the heart of the state. When an
engineering so vast may include events on a
scale never before seen manipulated to such
a degree, and openly so, it is curious how the
ideologies associated with such a drive for
'empire' has reached such a populace, so
willing to embrace a notion that benefits this
world-view, by endorsing it as a prime reality.
There question then rests at the point of the
depth of the corruption and here it is proposed
that the historical precedent for the players in
this epic drama require further consideration,
and scrutiny. In a sense, Watergate can be
seen as only cover for a deeper, and much
longer operation that continues today, even
as it crumbles the state its rogue government
now occupies. In essence, in deed, and fact,
the current US Government is Unconstitutional
and needs to be abolished and reconstituted
under another, revised and updated agreement
between citizens of how best to guide the future
of the public, and its role as representer of the
people who work, live, and occupy its dream.
The US Congress is thoroughly compromised.
The US Administration is entirely compromised.
The US Courts are fundamentally compromised.
And there are no checks and balances on the
wielding of private power over public truth, no
accountability between facts and deeds, there
exists no need to question bureaucratic policies
and procedures that only benefit a statistical and
imaginary constituency, and the state is being
weaned of all resources for private gain, which
will be irreparable in its damages to the future,
and present, heath and welfare of the citizens
of the US and the influence is hold in the world.
Everything to date, when taken as a whole,
indicates that there is a rogue element which
does not have the best interests of the United
States of America, or the world for that matter,
in its plans. And there is no way to bring public
feedback into this process, as its corruption is
so wide and deep as to threaten any attempt
to incrementally change it, as it can only then
collapse, which is and will eventually happen.
When, as of today, there is a sitting elected-
by-the-Supreme-Court majority President,
who in a time of national and international
tragedy is planning to leave the White House
for the month of August to live in Crawford,
Texas, during a crisis situation in North Korea
with actual nuclear weapons, and also the
nuclear situation with the Iranians, it is to
wonder how such a "Hands-Off" approach
is really serving the people of the United
States of America, or in fact, the civilized
world. It would indicate that decisions are
not being made by the President in this
White House, for if so, they would surely
remain in the nerve center instead of flee
it, as President Bush did on Sept. 11, 2001.
It would indicate that the person below-the-
ground, just like those mysterious bodies
that drowned, might be flipping the switches
and turning the dials, yet it need not even be
at this level, in the other concerted maneuvers
against the environment, transit, health care,
taxes, the economy, social programs, education,
it is all going to war and security-related causes,
maybe even a Holy War for a certain charismatic
true believer, who happens to smile about the
optimism they hold for the ongoing guerilla war
in Iraq, clearly using a common medication of
which euphoric optimism is a side-effect, but
misplaced when it is to smile at a question of
US soldiers dying and being bogged down,
and about Uranium claims, about lying about
the causes for war, and offering so unreal an
outlook as to question the basic sanity of the
US President to even fathom what is going on.
Instead, they will be leaving Washington D.C.
to go rest in Texas while there is a restless
nuclear situation. While there is an extremely
troubled government. While there is no good
reason to be optimistic with current policies
for anything from natural gas to closing bike
trails so highways can get slush funding. Or
more covers and fronts for sneak-through
legislation, as if the gaming of the system
that never was stopped with Watergate or
with Enron continues to this day, inside the
Oval Office and well beyond. What happens
to people who really would speak out? The
precedent is that they would end up dead,
in short order. Probably assassination, or
a murder that is made to look like a suicide.
That is why it is of concern to write about a
wide swath of this, and probably is good
enough reason for journalists and news
reporters to not consider it, for their own
health and safety. But it is too late for this.
It is too late to leave the problems of the
present to some future generation, it is
reprehensible to stand silent in the face
of the greatest horrors of our time, in the
sense that we can actually do something
about this situation, to improve it, firstly by
figuring out what it is, and if it is not what is
proposed above, what exactly is it? And,
also, to plan a common and non-partisan
platform for policies to readjust and also
resurrect the mission of a democratic state.
It is not a free ride, yet it is also a choice.
By choosing to understand the full extent
of the present situation, in its full context,
at least to try, and to make every effort to
go the actual distance needed to make
the necessary paradigmatic changes will
require everyone, of every walk of life to
find some relation in a shared, improved
future, and a plan for getting us there now.
The 2004 Elections cannot be about the
President's false infallibility, which is the
same as a religious devotion to despots
of the past, divine kings, which the very
Declaration of Independence apparently
could not separate the US psyche from,
enough so that it had to reenact itself. It
is not to be about the fallibility of any one
opponent where the entire resources of
the state and unlimited private money can
be used to smear the rival, retaining further
control in a period of months and years that
with each day are increasingly more and
more severe in their total devastation. It is
instead critical to get to the very core, the
inner core of this corruption, of which the
sitting President is a very small piece in a
much larger game that has become rotten.
Democracy is about people, not just power.
It is about the public, instead of only private
policies. It is about representation, but not
of a small demographic privileged minority.
It is about doing the most, not the least. It
is about dreams, not creating nightmares.
And it is about groups of individuals, not
individuals taking over all existing groups.
It is about freedom, liberty, and justice, and
not firstly the control of these to coerce them.
Please, consider what is at stake in the
questions, and if these are accurate to the
situation being faced today, and if the very
assumptions one makes when considering
what is underway is also limiting the ability
to see the larger, connect-the-dots to the
root-causes scenario which is crystal clear
in its connections between people, places,
events, and ideological agendas. Please,
for the sake of a point of view outside of that
in the controlled mass media, send this other
view to people who may also question the
basic assumptions, the basic discourses,
and the basic beliefs in present appraisals
of issues as serious as 9/11, Enron, War,
Nuclear and other WMD, security, loss of
civil liberties, and creation of a state that
cannot help but extinguish shared dreams.
This author seeks protection through this
transmission, the less it is transmitted, the
more danger to publish. Therefore it is now
asked that this be sent to pertinent people,
organizations, news outlets, reporters, and
blogs and lists, to get the story out, to get
the questions out, to ask the most basic
and simple questions which are now failed
in being addressed by legal representatives
of the US citizenry. It is up to individuals, the
groups of individuals, to try to make change,
reasonable and non-violent. This is one way
to contribute. Please, please do as much as
you can to keep the questioning alive.
And who is obsessed with historical revisionism?
There is reason to believe there acts of treason
are being committed in the highest levels and
deepest bunkers of the United States of America.
This is not a conspiracy theory: it is a conspiracy.
The US Government must thus be dissolved so
as to reconstitute it anew, to protect the dream.
-- Signed,
bc, one human being in 6 billion or so on Earth...
[This is a request for government protection, the
corruption described above is not defined in moral
but ethical terms, as such, it is believed this freedom
of thought is well within the rights of a US citizen to
express their ideas and share these in public, and
to have the constitutional, and other protections. If
it is an accurate hypothesis, one may be in danger.]
--- A few links, google for more source material:
*The 9/11 Evidence that May Hang George W. Bush
http://www.newsinsider.org/seal/smoking_gun.html
[1] Former CIA director presumed drowned
http://www.cnn.com/US/9604/29/colby.10pm/
http://www.subliminal.org/mugbook/spooks/colby.html
http://www.subliminal.org/mugbook/spooks/bush.html
http://edwardjayepstein.com/question_suicide.htm
"John Paisley, an ex-CIA officer, and liaison was the "B" team (which
reassessed US intelligence) had been suspected of being a Soviet mole.
He was found in the Chesapeake Bay, shot to death and weighed down with
weights— an apparent suicide."
The Body Count: Add One More
William Colby's Death Mystery
http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1999/3/24/185342
Unimpeachable Sources
Congress: Low Friends in High Places
http://villagevoice.com/issues/0330/mondo1.php
Lying -- a Bush Family Value
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2003/071803a.html
The Formation of the Clark Panel: More of the Secret Team at Work?
http://www.webcom.com/ctka/pr1195-clark.html
GEORGE BUSH: THE UNAUTHORIZED BIOGRAPHY
- PART 6 of 8. CHAPTER 16: CIA DIRECTOR
http://www.padrak.com/alt/BUSHBOOK_6.html
George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography -
by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin
Chapter 13- Chairman George in Watergate
http://www.the7thfire.com/bush12.htm
<nettime> Divine Corruption and Networked Democracy
<http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0307/
msg00072.html>
<design-l> Re: the Divine Co-media-rruption
<http://f05n16.cac.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0307&L=design-l&O=D&P=13063>
<design-l> designing safenews for the GOP
<http://f05n16.cac.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0307&L=design-l&O=D&P=14887>
<nettime> network lightning [action]
<http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0307/
msg00083.html>
More information about the Syndicate
mailing list