Who needs them?
Ivo Skoric
ivo at reporters.net
Sat Jul 19 00:39:32 CEST 2003
I am completely perplexed as to why does the US government
need the military tribunals for terrorists?! I mean, if they already
decided that anybody declared by the President to be a terrorist is
as guilty as sin, denying those poor loosers any rights of due
process (no open trial, no trial by jury, no right to chose a lawyer,
no right to talk to anybody, no right to know all the evidence held
against you, no right to appeal to an independent judiciary), holding
them incomunicado at undisclosed places around the planet,
preferrably such places that condone torture, WHY there is a need
for tribunals at all? Military can just milk the information they need
with stress and duress techniques out of the unfortunate suckers
that got caught, and disappear them thereafter - who would know?
This is simply a hipocrisy to allow for an illusion of justice, while
there is really no intention to dispense it. The most fantastic
aspect of the proposed tribunals is that even if the suspect is
acquitted there is no guarantee that he would walk - he may be
held continuously and indefinitely by the US authorities as a
security threat. What exactly would then the acquital actually
mean? And why on Earth would such a trial be neccessary to
anybody but a few Washington's sanctimonious bureaucrats?
ivo
More information about the Syndicate
mailing list