[syndicate] .fr internal affairs

[eduardo at navasse.net]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Hagenbach" <a2h at gmx.ch>
> does it get more interesting by making it bigger and ever lasting?
>
> artisticly spoken, why did you add more question marks to the already
> existing ones? i mean, a question mark is a question mark, and one
> expresses as much as the multidude of them. so - what did want to ask
> with question mark number 15?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Hagenbach" <a2h at gmx.ch>
> does it get more interesting by making it bigger and ever lasting?
>
> artisticly spoken, why did you add more question marks to the already
> existing ones? i mean, a question mark is a question mark, and one
> expresses as much as the multidude of them. so - what did want to ask
> with question mark number 15?

To use your own words, "artistically spoken" -- when you sent the first
reply with question marks you really needed only one, namely: "?"

To be clear -- it was you who originally added more than one.  Once, you add
more questions marks it does not matter how many there are -- your
proposition above makes this obvious.  And so, you, yourself, developed a
contradiction within your own "questioning."  My redudant quantity only made
such previous redundancy more obvious, which in a way is what makes
syndicate run...

I think you may be getting the point -- how much of the mail you have been
getting from syndicate actually means something? (if something  means
anything or if anything has meaning?)


Eduardo
:)
without permission