No subject

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

>One solution would be a seperate announcement list. Fibreculture, the
>Australian network of new media researchers and artists, has its own
>announcement list. It works quite well. On the main list, which is still
>open, there are around 750 subscribers. The announcement list is closed 
>(in
>order to really focus that channel) and moderated once a day and has 
>around
>520 subscribers. It's interesting to see how many people actually 
>appreciate
>such announcements. I agree here with what Andreas Broeckmann wrote 
>earlier.
>Announcements concerning festivals, publications and projects give a 
>network
>the substance it needs. They are a necessary nuisance. 

                                    jankee reklama 0+01


>Otherwise things
>might drift into completely Platonic spheres. 

                             geert lovink + andreas broeckman output
consists of copy pasting the supermarket 
occident spheres of re:fuse



>Online dialogues need to 
>be
>framed. 

!n sal!va


>If not, sooner or later people will ask themselves: 

It's interesting to see how many people


>why all this
>debate? 

tanz - sb

>And why debate only? 

u + andreas [only] !nv!td 2 01 tanz [oSt.europa zt!le


>Is 

!nv!td 2 01 tanz [oSt.europa zt!le

>there 

[oSt.europa zt!le


>perhaps something special about 

water shapes its flow in accordance with low ground



>having
>an argument? Why is hitting the reply button and writing something back 
>seen
>as the epiphany of online communication?
>
>Ciao, Geert