\ \ 242.procez

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

>Hello_

Hallo


>Is NATO compatitble with Mac OS X? If not, will it be in the near future?<br>

Included are answers to emails from 2-3 days prior.



        >242.objekts supports MacOSX in future?

        _presently i am waiting for the trial against cycling74 which should be very close.
        after which there is one minor legal issue to clarify with another western weakling and ... voila.




        >in future?

        i am ultrrrrrrra bored believe me. 
        as ... there is one `thing` i very verdi + ultra want.



        >And version up of Runtime is considered to be it in order to make
        >standalone?

        one may konstrukt standalones biensur.







        >A trial is a problem of a copyright?

        there shall be advertisements in newspapers before  
        naturally i have selected an attorney very komfortable with publicity
 



        >Because jitter resembles a nato program very much.


        as already indicated my attorney has been zig-zagging with the nicely aged [eye pirouettes] 
        cycling74 defense [good night stories. fluff fluff]

        the very boring non.sense is finally drawing to a close so 
        that the actual lawsuit may commence.





        >If 242.objekts did not exist, I did not purchase max/msp.
        >It is big fact.


        you arent alone.

        unfortunately cycling74 is what it is.
        so oke. i am forced to occupy extra time making space.


        for future generations - it is very very well worth it. 









>Best regards

Vänliga hälsningar / NN