The American Pope
Ivo Skoric
ivo at reporters.net
Sat Oct 12 20:12:42 CEST 2002
Jimmy Carter is kind of an American Protestant Pope. He travels
the world and preaches peace. He went to places like Sudan,
North Korea and Cuba, spoke his mind clearly, regardless of what
those in power there or in the US at the time thought. A couple of
people already got their Nobel prizes thanks to his work. So, it was
a surprise that he got his only after more than 10 nominations and
only whey it became means of critizicing present US policy.
“Formerly admired almost universally as the pre eminent champion
of human rights, our country has become the foremost target of
respected international organizations concerned about these basic
principles of democratic life. We have ignored or condoned abuses
in nations that support our antiterrorism effort, while detaining
American citizens as "enemy combatants," incarcerating them
secretly and indefinitely without their being charged with any crime
or having the right to legal counsel. This policy has been
condemned by the federal courts, but the Justice Department
seems adamant, and the issue is still in doubt. Several hundred
captured Taliban soldiers remain imprisoned at Guantánamo Bay
under the same circumstances, with the defense secretary
declaring that they would not be released even if they were
someday tried and found to be innocent. These actions are similar
to those of abusive regimes that historically have been condemned
by American presidents.”
(The Troubling New Face of America", by Jimmy Carter in
Washington Post on Friday, September 6, 2002)
-/-
Japan - Iraq
In 1945 the US was an undisputed power - perhaps, even more than
today - because of its ownership of that scary new weapon that they
used against Japan: the nuclear bomb. Japan was a hated imperialist
nation that conquered its neighbors and committed unspeakable crimes
against humanity against the population there. Therefore, Japan
neighbors didn’t view six year long US military occupation of Japan as
something repulsive. On the contrary. Also, although, Japan was a
militaristic society with no democratic tradition, it was also an industrial
society with skilled and educated workers. That made the application of
American help easier.
Both elements may be missing in the case of Iraq. It’s neighbors feel
more threatened by American presence, than by weakened Saddam
Hussein. Koreans, Chinese, Russians, Indonesians, Flipinos - they were
all suspicious of the US, but they hated Japan. Arab and Iran Muslims
while suspicious of Iraq, hate the US. That’s a crucial difference and may
have a large impact on the US plans. Iraq is essentially a ‘third world’
country rich with oil. Skilled workforce, industrial and educational
infrastructure is missing. That means - more work than in Japan, with less
regional support available.
Kissinger, being the abhorrent realist he is, immediately recognized that
subtle difference, and dismissed Bush’s Administration cry “We’ll make
Japan out of Iraq, once Saddam is gone” with utter disgust. But, it
sounds good. And the Congress voted for it. I doubt Security Council
will oppose it. China must be grateful for Bush’s governmental
intervention in the West Coast ports lock-out: what would their prison
factories do without the US as a market? All those ships just standing
there in the water must have hurt their economy even more than they
were hurting the US economy. Do they really want to risk Bush
becoming pro-labor, by threatening to veto an action which would
ultimately reduce the price of oil - something their economy will benefit
from, too?
Bush is going to be given a chance to make his war. But that places great
responsibility on him. His administration will be expected to deliver on
the promise of democracy and prosperity in Iraq and the region. But
while cheaper oil may benefit the world, it will re-enact the end of 18th
century France for many Arab kingdoms, and Iran, on a verge of its own,
intrinsic renaissance may suffer the most by having the process co-
opted by blunt Westernization.
-/-
Sniper
In the Balkans, where snipers became the trademark of disgusting
warfare tactics against civilians, most of them ultimately got caught, and
when they did, they were mostly spared the due process by being hurled
through the window of the high-rise (where from they did the shooting).
ivo
More information about the Syndicate
mailing list