No subject

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

>Hmmmmmm.....anyone want to take on this statement: "0100101110101101.ORG 
>merges art and everyday life."
>
>Which 0100101110101101.ORG project has anything to do with "everyday 
>life?" Or am I wrong that everyday life has nothing to do with Walter 
>Benjamin or open access FTP servers?

0100101110101101.ORG does merge art and everyday life - they are destitute




>>> i agree with tim's response to valery. rhizome.org is first and 
>>> foremost a nonprofit organization, but lately i've also started to 
>>> think of it as a social sculpture, i.e. as a participatory art work 
>>> in which speech and ideas form the raw materials in creating a 
>>> transformative social space in which the boundaries between art and 
>>> other things are blurred. i do think that this kind of 
>>> interdisciplinary convergence is one of the chacteristic features of 
>>> new media art in general, and net art in particular. etoy merges art 
>>> and corporate commerce. rtmark merges art and political activism. 
>>> joshua davis merges art and design. 0100101110101101.ORG merges art 
>>> and everyday life. several net artists merge art and interface. is it 
>>> really so problematic to think of rhizome.org as merging art and 
>>> online community?

a non. 
ma!z !t != alterz dze ztate ov rh!zome.org.

az all art organ!zaz!on rh!zome.org = korporat begarz



>>> -m

    uork!ng dze ztreetz r u +?